"You impose your views on me, but I don't impose mine on you", says the liberal

Modern universities are a propaganda tool for liberalism. Anyone who dares to even hold personal values or beliefs that are against liberal beliefs is deemed a bigot without question. The young university liberals think they are so inherently open-minded because they are progressive, liberal and, above all, anti-conservative. Most of those who do not get involved in politics or have a concern, the apolitical -  have liberal leanings: they believe that, if nothing else, one should not be a conservative. One should attack conservatives, never liberals even if the liberals are outrageous and act in a bullying manner.

The liberals say, "it's fine if conservatives have their views, but they should not impose it on others. They are the ones responsible for doing so, not the liberals." They say legislating with respect to (conservative) personal beliefs constitutes to imposing one's views on others. However, legislating with respect to liberal values is not imposing views on others? Do liberals not have personal beliefs? Regarding legislation, the values of some ideology, irrespective of what it is will ultimately underlie the law. That is the nature of policy. There is no policy that 100% of people are satisfied with, and you what? That's life. 

The liberals, of course, say that it does not impose views of others when its values are legislated with respect to because they provide "open choices" for all. But, there is a catch in this. What one may appear to be open choice is not always that - a choice. 

PC : The Friend of the Radical Social Engineers

PC enables radicals to twist the truth, and indoctrinate the masses with false assumptions, such as the assumption that only women are victims of violence, and always the victims, and that men are always the perpetrators. This leads to unjust policy making. Injustice leads to the destruction of society, hurt, despair, brokenness. To those who still support PC, brace yourself for the times of despair and suffering to come. I dare you to brace yourself.

What a University Education Should Be

The purpose of encouraging people to undergo university education should not be to merely get some qualifications, on top of enjoying leisure. It should be about developing character and understanding more about the society, culture and values. It is not a means to an end, but an means to another mean. Education is a life long process indeed. 

Many modern universities are infiltrated by liberal thinking academics who attempt to indoctrinate naive, uncritical thinking university students, who make up the majority, by teaching certain philosophies are rational, fundamental or objective. Some stop students who have alternative views, that is, conservative views from speaking out by using fear tactics in classrooms. 

Such students are increasingly seen as "racist", "sexist", "homophobic" or "illogical" because conservatives make up a minority - sometimes a minority of one. Conservatives have what many see as outdated, irrelevant or redundant ideologies which deserve to be punished. In addition to this, the student body in charge of providing services to students can use their position to silence alternative voices, while claiming that they speak for all, simply because politically incorrect alternative views have no place in a liberal university.

Radical Feminism in Australia

Check out this article about radical feminism in Australia:

http://antigones.fr/page/5/

Ban sex-selective abortion, but not abortion: Selfish and Hypocritical

The radical feminists are ardently campaigning against sex-selective abortion. However, they support abortion. The reason for this is that many girls have been aborted. There is also a possibility that boys may be aborted in (some Western) countries where females are favoured because they are believed to be more hardworking or stronger than males out of pure feminist bias.

Abortion should not be legalised in the first place. Banning abortion will prevent any sex-selective abortion. The radical feminists are those who cannot be trusted because they spread false ideas about our world. They  have obviously forgotten that they were once a foetus. Maybe they should think about why they were given birth. If they were not aborted, they would not be able to enjoy, as they do, inciting hatred towards men.

If sex-selective abortion were targeted at males, the feminists would be happy. Why? Feminists are misandrists.

The Modern Feminist Speeh

The progressive liberal media has contributed to legitimising misandry (the hatred of men) in the name of "misogyny". It has twisted the definition of equality by supporting the evil proposition that because men dominate (whatever that means) over women, women need to be able to express the thoughts about men in any way women want regardless of how insulting or rude it is.

The following would be a modern feminist speech:

We have almost come to a stage where we are equal to men. We have equal pay and laws to protect the safety of women. However, we need more women in politics to control the vices of men. We do not have such vices. Men are the ones with the vices.

Although men are sometimes hurt by the actions of some women, we must look after women only to help ourselves. We do not need the support of men or our children. We should punish rape, but not seduction of men by women because we are entitled to indulge in physical pleasure. Men are not entitled to indulge in physical pleasure because they have to work for us. They are our slaves who are not even entitled to fundamental basics.  We need men to work for us as slaves because otherwise they will bully us.

We got to where we are by ourselves - only half of the world's population. We do not need the other half of the world's population although everyone contributes to the activities that go in our global community. 

Women are placed on earth to have fun. Men are placed to work for us so we can have fun. Past treatment of us by men is our excuse. Although it makes the society chaotic and destabilised, and hurts people, it is legitimate because women are the ones in control.

Modern feminism is a double standard. I would even argue that the past treatment of women by men may not even have been so bad. At least it was probably not as sneaky and cunning.

Modern (radical) feminists should be ashamed of who they are and grow up. They should learn to care for others.

Postmodernism: Every view is equally valid

One of the core tenets of postmodernism is that every view is equally valid. Since every view of equally valid,  every view deserves equal respect. It is true that every person is equal regardless of race, sex, religion, political belief, physical status or socioeconomic background. However, this does not mean that every view that people have is of equal validity. Radical feminists use the strawman argument (or strawwoman for sake of the political correctness  that they demand) to argue that because women have the right to wear absolutely anything they want to, women should not be blamed for assault. While it is wrong to blame any victim for any harm they suffer, what people wear is nothing to do with the question of whether or not a woman should be blamed. The premise that women have the right to wear absolutely anything is a distractor. Feminists are only trying to use the pretext of assault to justify wearing absolutely anything they want. As much as people have a responsibility to control themselves, people should also not entice people to do the wrong thing.

My warning, from a female perspective, to the modern (Australian) male is that there are many bad women out there who use manipulative, cunning methods to use men for their own pleasure. Where possible, avoid talking to the ones who seem nice, but condone such manipulation. Don't associate with them. They will destroy you.