Darwinism (5): The Ultimate Justification of Eugenics and Abortion (including Sex-Selection Abortion)

As we are all animals who have no value, according to the Darwinism theory, eugenics, the extermination of an unwanted part of the population whether it be ethnic minorities or girls, is totally legitimate. Why? Because no human deserves any respect if that is the case. Eugenics, abortion, population control and birth control come together. 

Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger who once said "We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population." Yep, that's right. The eugenicist had the intention of providing abortion to exterminate a certain race for being of that race. This is the height of racism. She and others eugenicists founded Planned Parenthood and justified abortion on the ground that it "helps" women. 

Abortion is a means of putting a woman through pain and guilt, and the killing of a baby. It allows irresponsible fathers to shift the responsibility of looking after a child to the mother. Abortion is a right? No. It is not. It is does not merely incite violence against women and children: it IS violence against women and children. Yet, the liberals who claim to be so against violence against women support it.

Abortion clinics are killing machines. It is time they shut down. It is the ultimate exploitation of women, and the killing of innocent people. 

Sources: 

The Ultimate Exploitation of Women: Abortion, by Brian E Fisher

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC97E8D2162EBAFBD - Investigation of Planned Parenthood which condones sex-selection abortion (of girls) despite claiming it seeks to "help" women.

Darwinism (4): Practical Applications of Darwinism

Darwinism has been applied by fascists and dictators to dehumanise people - literally. Hitler argued that Jews were not people by using pseudo-scientific arguments that drew from Darwinist evolution. Mao and Stalin used Darwinism to justify the mass murders of their own people.

For Counterexamples to Evolution see: http://conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Evolution

Darwinism (3): What is really is?

Darwinism is the idea that something comes from nothing and that things exist as a result of random acts, rather than acts with intelligence behind the design of the beauty of nature. To say something exists by acts of randomness is to say that a building has no builder, or a painting has not painter.

Since there is no intelligent force behind natural things, including humans, there is no moral accountability or responsibility. That is why the current generation of youth embrace Darwinism. Darwinism teaches us that we can do anything we like without accountability, responsibility or even the feeling of guilt. It teaches us that we can murder, rape, commit incest, paedophilia, fornicate and exterminate unwanted sections of the world's population.

The Two Fighting Youths

A youth punched  another youth
In the darkness of the valley
The punching and beating and kicking
Went on repeatedly
The onlookers gazed far into the distance
Not even eyeing the river of blood
The sun came up
And two bodies were found
One would wonder
How many more bodies could be found
If anyone stopped to help
For the victim was not innocent victim
But a guilty victim
Who had glassed her victim
Because she was casually talking to her lover

The Perpetual Jail Kid

The prisoner was once a kid,
A young innocent kid
Who knew not his father, but only his mother
Who beat him, knived him, skulled him
In the name of Independence
And who expected only yearly payments
Who demanded the government give her
Not what she needed, but what she thought she needed
The now grown kid
Learnt only how to take, but not to give
How to envy the workers, but not how to work
How to trash, but not how to clean up one's act
Now he is the perpetual jail kid.
Who knows no values and morals

Had he had a known father
Who could have loved him ,and cared for him
Who knows where he may now be?
But, it was too sad,
One may only blame his parents
For their irresponsible selfish acts
To satisfy their pleasure
The fruit of their desire
A rotten delinquent, a
A perpetual jail kid

Darwinism (2): Evidence Against Evolution

There are many testable and provable scientific theories that refute Darwinian evolution.

1. Order within living systems - Evolution (that is, Darwinian evolution) purports that living things are a result random molecules that order themselves with purpose to form living things that can function independently of external forces. Darwinism contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics which can be proved mathematically.
2. Living things do not arise from non-living things as can be observed in nature. Have you ever seen a living thing being a product of non-living things? Asexual or sexual reproduction by living things is needed to give rise to living things.
3. Darwinism purports that mutations are random. However, mutations, that is variations in a species are not random by inherited through gametes. They are caused by environmental factors such as climate, UV exposure

The Dark 20th Century

The 20th century has been more people die from war than the previous 19 centuries put together. Germany, Japan and Italy were known as the three military fascist states. Germany and Japan are banned from being permanent members of the UN Security Council as a result of their past atrocities. The slogan 'Never Again' as such strong words which shame a people to never forget and never repeat its crimes against humanity.

The war of China and South Korea against Japan over the war history of Japan continues. Footage of the war waged by the Japanese in Nanking was captured as evidence for the war crimes committed by the Japanese troops. The Japanese Government worships the executed military generals as though they were gods and do not admit the atrocities it committed against the Koreans, Chinese, Malays, Indonesian, Thais, Vietnamese, Phillipinos and all other victimised countries.

The darkness of the 20th century has become darker in the 21st century where truth can be lie, and lies can be truth.

Merry Christmas

Christmas is now a very commercialised event. In Australia, it is characterised by shopping, meeting with friends, parties and wine. Many  forget those who are lonely, poor needy, sick and victimised. Helping the lonely, poor needy, sick and victimised is the true spirit of what Christmas is supposed to be.

Merry Christmas and Have a Happy New Year!

Darwinism (1): The Hypothesis

Many people believe that Darwinism is a legitimate theory on the grounds that it is scientific and evidence points to the evolution of species. Proponents of Darwinism show the series of the pictures depicting small horse to the large horse, the similarity of embyros between different species and claim that the number of finch species in the Galapagos has increased over time. However, simply because the embyros of different species look similar does not mean that they have a common ancestor. Simply because there are different features of horses discovered over times does not mean that they evolved in the sequence as discovered.

Hidden Pride

Many people in the West insist on foreign intervention. Some even believe that a country that does not become involved in such intervention is a bad evil country. However, many who think this way fail to see how no sides of a conflict is completely innocent. These pro-intervention people argue that governments must help where possible, but fail to see that it is a matter between the parties involved in the conflict to resolve the conflict themselves as they are in the best possible position. In addition to this, such intervention may stir up more conflict and increase, not decrease social stability. Ultimately, seeing the need to intervention because one's own country can resolve such conflicts is based on the prideful belief that one is superior. This is why so many countries in the Africa and Asia, as well as the Middle East see the West as a cunning enemy, not a benevolent power.

Beware the anti-PC Crusade, says the liberals

The liberals at university self-righteously express concern with people who are against PC. For those of you who don't know what PC is, it is political correctness. The anti-PC crusaders are fighting against PC because they believe PC shuts down debate. However, one can argue that these anti-anti-PC crusaders are the ones trying to shut down debate against them, while opening up more "debate" (read: indoctrinating propaganda) for themselves. How open-minded are the anti-anti-PC crusaders.

Wake up Australians, Apartheid is Alive and Well in Australia

Mandela is Gone, but Apartheid is Alive and Well in Australia. It's time Australians wake up and confront the ugly reality underlying the veneer of Australian tolerance.

Liberal journalists Assume they are Superior

The liberal media loves to control what people think. They call it their job because they think they are superior to everyone, especially since they are anything but 'conservative' - the dirtiest word in liberal vocabulary. CNN Desperately Defends Obama's Relationship with Radical Professor is a classic example. The journalist tells a person with an alternative view about the Critical Race Theory that he doesn't understand the Theory. She reminds me of Leigh Sales and Chris Uhlmann. Leigh Sales, in particular, likes to repeat questions to a people she does not agree with simply because she thinks she is so smart, open-minded and superior, only to find her enemies turn the tables on her.

Unlimited Rights

It seems as though, in the postmodernised world, everything is possible as there is no right or wrong. Hence, paedophilia may one day be regarded as a right since there is no absolute right or wrong. It would be before we know it, a group of paedophilic oversexed academics gather together to form the Children and Adult Love organisation to promote "loving" relationships between children and adults, and there would be the paedophile (or in PC terms: child-lovers) rights movement. The term 'paedophile' would be changed to child-lovers to push forward the movement.

Psychopaths are Not Merely Explosive Bombs

Modern psychology teaches us that psychopaths are merely people who have gone mad owing to one's genetics and one's dire circumstances. Thus, the modern psychologists say, mass murderers and serial rapists are the way they are because of genetics and their circumstances. Yes, genetics and circumstances may play a role, but ultimately it is the moral centre of the individual that decides whether one would do such things. There are many crazy people out there, but not all of us do such things. Why? Because we have a moral centre. To say that psychopaths killers do what they do is like saying that the mean girl or bully boy only does what she or he does because of one's inherited genes, plus a set of bad circumstances. Modern psychology is: a propaganda tool for liberalism.

The impact of sex selection and abortion in China, India and South Korea

The impact of sex selection and abortion in China, India and South Korea. The problem with sex-selective abortion apart  from the abortion itself.

The One and Only Alfonzo Rachel

Alfonzo Rachel may be a social conservative, but he is not the 'typical' social conservative that many anti-conservatives or liberals may make him out to be. He is witty, intelligent, humourous (because he is political humourist) and above all, he does not judge those who have different views from him. Instead, he kindly and gently expresses his stance on a range of political issues including welfare, gay marriage, racial politics and the liberal education agenda using moral logic. He is upfront, honest and does not hide his opinion.

For an alternative analysis of politics, check out his website at: http://alfonzorachel.com/.

Imagine a Boot Stamping on a Human Face

Imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever. This is what Big Brother said to Winston, the protagonist of George Orwell's 1984 who sought to resist a totalitarian government, but tragically failed to do so. Sadly enough, one need not imagine such a violent oppressive act. One need only see what is happening through the news and by personal observation.

Australia is becoming increasingly violent. A man stomped on someone's head as a act of violence in New South Wales. This is only one is many cases of violence. However, such acts of violence against a man is not portrayed by the media as something that is shocking or even unacceptable. It is portrayed as something normal and tolerable, fueling a culture of violence. Only acts of violence against Australian women are portrayed as unacceptable and worthy of condemnation, whereas acts of violence against all others are unworthy of any media attention. In addition to this, speaking out against the media for omitting such acts is considered 'sacrilege' in our culture because speaking out about media bias towards its favourite group incites 'violence against (read: Australian) women'.

Silence about evil is worse than the act of evil itself. Thus, the media is a boot that stamps on the faces of certain groups by politicising the suffering of others.  The media is the root of all hypocritical "benevolence".

Foreign Intervention = Asking for Trouble

Many people in the West assume that they are capable of helping countries ravaged by civil war and should attempt to help such countries accordingly. However, civil wars are never simple and both sides have a self-interested agenda, whether they be the government, rebels or juntas. People who fight against others have an agenda to advance their own means whether it be for a good intention or a bad intention. Of course, some will criticise this argument as one which is attempting to find an excuse for not 'helping' others. Fighting always involves harming or hurting others, something that is completely against helping others for their good. Using harm to fight others from harming others does not enable one to help others. The need to 'help' others has been used hypocritically by the West to show its "altruism" to gain support from the weaker countries, only to find that these countries often resent the West even more than they did before foreign intervention.

Human Rights are Self-rationalisation Tool

Human rights is the idol of the modern world. People scream about violation of their "human rights" as soon as their pursuit of their self-interests or those of their allies have been violated. However, they turn a blind eye and even justify the same act they condemned when others are subject to the same treatment. Therefore, human rights have been used as a tool of rationalising one's interests. This is what 'human rights' are for. It is to advance the humanist agenda of progression.

It's so Fashionable to be a Child/Youth Worker (yes, in Australia)

Many teenagers from the age of 14 to young adults of university age are employed in casual jobs. I understand that not everyone is there for the money, but I do understand that many of them, but not all, have the motive of competing with their friends in terms of their career prospects. A girl once told me that she wanted to work because you 'need to work your way up'. She is one of many who is a materialist and a hedonist. This quest for power is the same for the quest for riches as they are both material possessions. Many people think that serving the boss is something worthwhile, while helping one's family members and serving one's family is slavery. It is this disdain of helping the family that many think it is fashionable to start working early - to fight for power and money.

I am not in any way saying it is wrong to work while young. I am pointing out the attitude of many young people whose motive to work is a means of seeking power and money.

Australian Universities: A Breeding Ground for Wild Stupid and Inappropriate Behaviour

Australian universities are the cornerstone of the Australian economy. (Whether the economy is boosted by future workers, that is , generation Y is a different matter. However, they are also a breeding ground for wild people. Many Australian university student (ie. the culturally Australian locals, not ethnic minorities born in Australia or international students) not only participate in, but celebrate wild behaviour, such as doing 'inappropriate things behind closed doors'. Anyone who does not support or condone these things is deemed to be a backwards, stupid, naive, retarded idiot by majority of university students. The older generation of Australians often point out and are shocked at how wild university students have become. It is true that there were some wild university students in those days, but such wild behaviour was not cultural.

The wild young people think they are invincible because they are too proud to see how they must face the consequence or accept responsibility and they think they are so sophisticated by doing these things, only to find out they are not as invincible as they really are. How sophisticated are the wild partiers. It would not be surprising if the future Australian economy suffocates, because Generation Y is a generation of hedonists who are self-entitled and only know of fighting for one's rights.

Scientism is the New Black

Scientism is one of the most dominant ideologies in the modern world. It purports that anything that cannot be proved true by science cannot be accepted per se. The underlying belief is that science can determine the truth of all things and that anything which cannot be proven by science, such a moral values, has no value of truth. Such a philosophy would be questionable, as science can merely seek to show the truth about that of the physical world, rather than other spheres such as the sociocultural or economic world.

Beware the Little Old Lady

A little old lady tripped in a public shower because of her own clumsiness. Being very poor she decided to feign intense pain by deliberately falling over in a public space. Owing to the cultural obligation of looking after the elderly, a teacher who pitied the old lady asked 3 young school kids to help her. Two of them grabbed her hand, while the other gave instructions about how to help someone up. 

The old lady noted which school the kids came from. She alleged to the principal that the kids who helped her deliberately pushed her over. The principal, shocked, immediately gave her the addresses of the kids. Being a shrewd cunning old lady, she sued the kids' parents for "pushing" her over. Two of the kids parents gave her some money to pay for medical fees. One of the kids, however, fiercely rejected the claim that he pushed her over when interrogated by his parents. 

"My whole family will die if you do not pay," the old lady threatened the parents who the kid who denied pushing her over. "You obviously do not teach your kids properly. He pushed me over. Your kids will be cursed one day- because of you," she continued to taunt. The daughter-in-law of the old lady, who knew the truth about the incident exclaimed in shock, "You fell over out of you own clumsiness! How dare you tell such a lie!" 

The lies of the old lady died. So the parents of the kid took the story to the media. 'Beware of the little old lady', the media preaches. 

Based on a true story in China. 

What Comes in, Must Come Out

One need not be a biology student to know that some of what one eats will be excreted as waste. Toxins and food material that converts into toxins in the body will be excreted. Similarly, liberalism must be excreted from the society. Liberalism is a disease which must be flushed out of one's system. Check out a contrast to the liberal material that you are bombarded by  in the modern world at http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page. Whether you agree with it or not is a different matter, but I urge you to check it out to get an alternative perspective.

Conversations with Liberals about PC

Below are my experiences with liberals on campus about the concept of political correctness and its implications:

One guy told me that the term 'political correctness' is a "derogatory" term used by the 'right' against the left. The other guy with him said that he supports political correctness. I explained that we are trying to get people to analyse and think about whether we need political correctness. I told them that people these days are very confused about what 'tolerance', 'discrimination', etc means. I gently told them that we seek to explore what these terms mean as these terms have been twisted around to serve the self-interests of particular groups who claim to serve all. 

One woman, who must be a liberal/progressive was saying how we need political correctness to stop people from being "discriminatory". She interrogated me (literally), by aggressively asking me to apply examples of situations where political correctness is dangerous. I told her immediately that PC can be used to legitimise inappropriate or evil behaviour like paedophilia. "Political correctness can be used by paedophiles to justify the "right" to paedophilia," I said. She nodded in agreement. There was no choice, but to nod.

I was telling a girl I know from the the Reform Party about how we are starting up a think tank to discuss political correctness. I did not tell her it was called 'Stop Political Correctness'.  She said it sounds exciting and that she would be willing to participate. She demonstrates an understanding of political correctness and supports it. She also told me in a self-righteous manner that she would be concerned about people who are trying to stop political correctness rather than political correctness itself. Such is expected from a liberal. 

Nasty, Hypocritical Pretentious Journalists - Typical (small 'l') liberals

Again, Leigh Sales engages in the ABC liberal-style advocacy journalism which hypocritically stands up for minorities, in this case, refugees. This is not to say she is the only journalist who does so, and so it would be unfair to say she is the only person who does so. However, she is the classic example of an advocacy journalist. Her interview with Immigration Minister Scott Morrison involved asking questions based on the assumption that her opinions are facts or, even worse, truth. She starts of with a leading question about the way 'asylum seekers' were treated, such that there is no way the interviewee can argue against her (superficial?) opinion without looking like he does not understand the question. When he tries to put forward his case, she cuts him off.

Sales, like many liberals, is like a growing child who assumes that anyone who disagrees with her, or tries to build a case against her is bad, evil or not to be trusted. Many liberals, one could suspect, feel sympathy for people who are deviant, or engage in illegal activity because they themselves are perhaps not strong enough or moral enough to follow the law where the law is morally and ethically sound.

People identify with people who have one thing in common with them and have no capacity to attack (having grounds to criticise) them tend to feel sympathy for them, or even think that the bad behaviour of people similar to them is justifiable. On the other hand, those who one perceives to be  capable of attacking them and have something in common with the perceived potential attacker are despised the most. This is perhaps why the media typically feels "sorry" for minority groups - because it makes them look like they are giving the minorities a voice.

Human Selfishness Proved by Psychological Studies

Psychological studies have shown that people are more likely to help others who are perceived to be victims only if they can be categorised together to have a common characteristic. (Levine, M., Cassidy, C., Brazier., G., & Reicher, S. (2002). Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Twoexperimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(7), 1452 – 1463.) This, I believe is not a propaganda tool. It is a plausible claim. Just look at all the media attention and public attention devoted to  Jill Meagher when she was raped and murdered. Compare this attention to a person of an ethnic minority or a man.

The media is controlled by mainly feminists who identify with only middle-class, cultured, Western career women like themselves. The psychological theory which has been thoroughly studies explains why these stuck-up hypocritical bastards from the media who preach "tolerance", value the lives of Westerners over Africans, Indigenous Australians, Jews, Asians and anyone else who is not an Australian Westerner.

Whatever your opinion about the blatant media bias, the theory shows human selfishness that is inherent in all humans.

Interference with the Affairs of Others is Utterly Unnecessary and Stupid

Interfering with the private or personal affairs of others has become a socially and politically fashionable trend in the Australia. Whether you critique the beliefs of another culture, political group or religion, or, make a statement about how hard or annoying you find another to be, you are sure to have someone reprimand you for doing so as if it was a demonic evil thing you were doing. I've had that happen to me before. Forget about whether the person is in a position to understand what you are saying, it is absolutely patronising. It is also insulting when the person does not understand the framework from which you operate and they criticise you for being "intolerant", "bigoted" or being "unhelpful". The legitimate critiques people make are a private affair and need no reprimanding, and therefore unnecessary.

The only criticism that deserve criticism for being criticism are the ones that attempt to stop itself from being critiqued.