Guilt-tripping, Rights and Oppression

Person A: "There are no such things as rights."

Person B: "What about discrimination against [demographic group of Person A]?"

Person B above has engaged in guilt-tripping, to make Person A feel guilty. This is the evil technique liberalists like Person B use, to push forward liberalism. Rights and oppression come together. Rights are a self-perceived entitlement to have and do as one chooses, leading to bullying.

If you talk to me about rights, don't you DARE use guilt-tripping. There is no such thing as rights, only obligations to be kind to others and be righteous.

We Hate Labouring but like to for the Status and Pleasure (1)

The following series of posts is dedicated to Australians who love to complain about their rights. It can be sung as a song, rap or poem

I need  money and status
I need love and relationship
So I go to work and work
But swear at my co-workers
I slap my boss in the face
Getting with my secret lover
In front of all others
To make them feel jealous
I had too much to drink on Thursdays and Fridays
And every other night
So I take my sickie - what a beauty!
That's why I work
When I hate labour, I love parties and fighting
That's why I party!!!!
YEEEEEEEAAHHHHHH!!!!!

Where does 'Equality' Come from?

There is a great deal of debate and talk about equality, but the one question no one ever asks is: what is the origin of equality? By whose standards does equality come from? We seem to think that we can use human standards, however, humans have shown that they cannot agree on what is the meaning of equality. Thus, it appears, that equality cannot be found by using human standards. There must be something else to provide for equality, or else, equality has no meaning.

Foreign Intervention is Stupid, Useless and Garbage! (unless it is to acquire more resources)

Some silly people think that their government needs to involve itself with military means in the internal political affairs of other countries. They think that not doing so amounts to allowing atrocities to happen. It may seem like so on the surface, but such silly naive people do not realise that military intervention (or foreign intervention) not only worsens the situation, but that war is murder. Yet these people claim that they helping to reduce murders in war. That I need to even write this goes to show how naive and politically useless some people are.

To say military intervention is a moral obligation is to say that one must report to the principal of one's own school how two people from another school are fighting, especially when that school has its own principal.

Darwinism (5): The Ultimate Justification of Eugenics and Abortion (including Sex-Selection Abortion)

As we are all animals who have no value, according to the Darwinism theory, eugenics, the extermination of an unwanted part of the population whether it be ethnic minorities or girls, is totally legitimate. Why? Because no human deserves any respect if that is the case. Eugenics, abortion, population control and birth control come together. 

Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger who once said "We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population." Yep, that's right. The eugenicist had the intention of providing abortion to exterminate a certain race for being of that race. This is the height of racism. She and others eugenicists founded Planned Parenthood and justified abortion on the ground that it "helps" women. 

Abortion is a means of putting a woman through pain and guilt, and the killing of a baby. It allows irresponsible fathers to shift the responsibility of looking after a child to the mother. Abortion is a right? No. It is not. It is does not merely incite violence against women and children: it IS violence against women and children. Yet, the liberals who claim to be so against violence against women support it.

Abortion clinics are killing machines. It is time they shut down. It is the ultimate exploitation of women, and the killing of innocent people. 

Sources: 

The Ultimate Exploitation of Women: Abortion, by Brian E Fisher

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC97E8D2162EBAFBD - Investigation of Planned Parenthood which condones sex-selection abortion (of girls) despite claiming it seeks to "help" women.

Unlimited Rights

It seems as though, in the postmodernised world, everything is possible as there is no right or wrong. Hence, paedophilia may one day be regarded as a right since there is no absolute right or wrong. It would be before we know it, a group of paedophilic oversexed academics gather together to form the Children and Adult Love organisation to promote "loving" relationships between children and adults, and there would be the paedophile (or in PC terms: child-lovers) rights movement. The term 'paedophile' would be changed to child-lovers to push forward the movement.

Human Rights are Self-rationalisation Tool

Human rights is the idol of the modern world. People scream about violation of their "human rights" as soon as their pursuit of their self-interests or those of their allies have been violated. However, they turn a blind eye and even justify the same act they condemned when others are subject to the same treatment. Therefore, human rights have been used as a tool of rationalising one's interests. This is what 'human rights' are for. It is to advance the humanist agenda of progression.

Australian Universities: A Breeding Ground for Wild Stupid and Inappropriate Behaviour

Australian universities are the cornerstone of the Australian economy. (Whether the economy is boosted by future workers, that is , generation Y is a different matter. However, they are also a breeding ground for wild people. Many Australian university student (ie. the culturally Australian locals, not ethnic minorities born in Australia or international students) not only participate in, but celebrate wild behaviour, such as doing 'inappropriate things behind closed doors'. Anyone who does not support or condone these things is deemed to be a backwards, stupid, naive, retarded idiot by majority of university students. The older generation of Australians often point out and are shocked at how wild university students have become. It is true that there were some wild university students in those days, but such wild behaviour was not cultural.

The wild young people think they are invincible because they are too proud to see how they must face the consequence or accept responsibility and they think they are so sophisticated by doing these things, only to find out they are not as invincible as they really are. How sophisticated are the wild partiers. It would not be surprising if the future Australian economy suffocates, because Generation Y is a generation of hedonists who are self-entitled and only know of fighting for one's rights.

Why Politics is Inevitable

Politics is about seeking one's own self-interests. It inevitably involves manipulating others to push one's interests across. In doing so, lying, deceit and misleading propaganda is needed. However, not all political groups are the same. Some seek self-interests using an ethical manner, but most don't. As humans are all inherently selfish, politics is inevitable in this world whether one likes it or not.

Dignity Does not confer Individual Rights

Especially these days, one cannot be sure whether one is oppressed or not. There is not because oppression is a relative concept. It is indeed not, but people treat it as though it was relative when it concerns their enemies, but treat it as though it was absolutist when it concerns their own or their allies. Oppression is to strip away the dignity of others. This dignity comes from being created equal to all others and from this alone. Dignity is not granted by government, society, family, culture or any other human institution. It is objective. Rights, however, do not arise from dignity. Rather, obligations based on a categorical imperative come from this dignity. Everyone must follow the categorical imperative to ensure it is not broken.

What Discrimination Really is

Australians yell out "discrimination" every time their self-perceived entitlement or  "right" is "violated". There is no such thing as a "right"  in the objective universal sense. There are only categorical imperatives to do or not do so certain things. Thus, discrimination cannot arise when one's right is violated, it only occurs when people break the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives are what every person must follow for the imperative to operate universally. This is the core of the Kantian theory of ethics. Discrimination occurs when people treat some more harshly or lenient than others with respect to fulfilling these obligations.

Of course, for a country in which obligations are foreign, and any call for obligation is equated to slavery, no one in Australia would understand this, except for a very few.

Communist phrases

• Whether you like it or not
• Do as I say without question
• You must give up your rights
• Your must respect the authority of the government
• There is no such thing as a right
• Rights are self-perceived entitlements
• Weaker groups do not deserve more help or privileges

Comments on our Republic: Health Care a "right"?

Comments on our Republic: Health Care a "right"?: The double standards of the liberal concept of "rights".

The Origins of Political Correctness

There is a hard ideological difference between the so-called left and right wings. The left uses political correctness to get its agenda across. The right uses a case-by-case approach when it comes to making policies. Its policies are not based on any social victimisation theory, social "equality" theory or social "justice" theory. The origins of political correctness came from World War I when Marx predicted that all the workers of the world would unite and destroy capitalism - to get rid of all oppression. Marxism was divorced from economic theory, and become married to culture, hence the birth of cultural Marxism. Critical theories in all areas such as feminism, queer theory and postmodernism flowed from cultural Marxism - the need to help the oppressed. However, whether these critical theories are really about helping the oppressed or just pretending to be oppressed is a different matter. Marxism has been abused by certain minorities to yell out "victim" and blame the dominant groups.

I recommend you check out the link below. It explains the origins of political correctness in depth.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrt6msZmU7Y

Sociology: The Indoctrination Machine

The Chairman of China, Xi Jin Ping once said that, to foreigners, there is not one China, but a thousand different slices of China.  What a profound phrase! There are indeed many ways to look at society. One sees society through one's lens which has been shaped by one's values and beliefs.

Sociology is the study of society. Hence, in sociology, one of the subjects which I have studied, social theories are taught. There are many ways to look at society, and this is no cliche. Sometimes, what others interpret as a lack of something, may not be seen as an issue by another because the latter believes the lack is not a lack at all.

 For example, people in Asia do not talk about rights. Instead, these people talk about communalistic obligations. People in the West may see this a dangerous because it leads to entrenched discrimination because people are not able to fight for what they see as rights. However, people from communalistic societies could argue that  allowing people to fight for rights leads to unacceptable selfish behaviour and does not stop discrimination. Different social groups have a different framework of thinking, and hence a different social structure.

Sociology courses in Western universities are based on humanistic, rights-based framework. It is not an objective ideology that all must submit to, but a subjective one. It is a perspective. The dangerous thing about sociology courses is that lecturers are in a position to indoctrinate students with ideologies that are dangerous - ones that incite hatred against certain groups who are against the liberal regime, in the guise of tolerance. Tolerance, in which one must support certain minorities and hate those who are against them. This is the hidden agenda that infiltrates modern universities - the intolerance of tolerance.

Letter to Rights Groups

To the Rights Groups

You are always talking about "rights", saying that the rights of what you call minorities are not respected. You tend to put these groups into discrete categories to the exclusion of all others - women, homosexuals, refugees and certain ethic minorities (but not all ethnic minorities). You are always trying to lecture us about equality and fairness.

If person of a "marginalised" group such as an ethic minority, woman, refugee or a homosexual commits a kills a person who is of a dominant  (redundant and outdated) group, it deserves to be treated with leniency. If a person of a dominant group even dares to think that a person of a "marginalised" group is untrustworthy, you would immediately demand that person by ostracised by society. You may say, it is not as though we demand that they be executed, but really, thinking someone is untrustworthy is not wrong in itself. You make it that only you can say that dominant groups are untrustworthy simply because you cannot accept their strength, rather than dominance.

You use the term dominance erroneously as many of those people of marginalised groups are very successful. You use it to psychologically induce people to accept your lies about victimhood.

You are not a decent bunch. You do not genuinely care about people - you are only after your own cunning self-interests to control those who you are jealous of.

The Centrists and Communalists

PS: We are the ones who you call "conservative".

Letter from Rights Groups

To everyone, in particular the dominant groups

Rights are entitlements that all people should be able to enjoy. Owing to the many injustices in this world, the rights to many people are eroded and it is always minorities who suffer. Minorities are people whose rights are neglected. Since about 99% of people do not care about the rights of others, we need to take radical action.

We need to take away the rights of dominant groups, because dominant groups oppress us. They are the ones who are evil and are always to be blames. It is true some of us are strongly disliked by dominant alpha groups, but how can we be evil? We support minorities for the good of humanity. People should not look down on us, they should look down on those who hate us. However, if we hate others, it is because we have a legitimate right to.

We claim rights to protect others. We are entitled to more rights than others because we are disadvantaged. The suffering we face is because of dominant groups. Who are these dominant groups? Men, straight people, people from rich, and increasingly strong non-Western countries or people of these cultures. These people are the ones who have no right to existence because we the minorities say so. What we the minorities say should not be questioned. We are not trying to control and silence others - we are trying to gain our needs.

In minoritarian solidarity

A Rights Group

PS: We are a minoritarian group that supports the rights of minorities.

The Concept of Rights and Happiness

It is a well accepted idea in these days that there is no such thing as an absolute right and wrong. In fact, anyone who dares to make such a statement is labelled as proud, arrogant, hypocritical, or negative. With regards to negativity, it is not a matter of whether a statement implies something and explicitly makes a negative comment. I dare ask the postmodernist, if you think there is no right or wrong, what is "negative" with respect to ethics and morality? We are so inculcated with the idea of no absolutes and that everything is not only open for interpretation, it is as one interprets. This is the core of postmodernism. 

Many argue that the concept of rights is not a matter of morality, it is about achieving human happiness. Human happiness is all we need, we have been taught, and it all seems to make sense. Whenever we lose happiness, all we think is how do we regain it. Many of us devote our lives to buying happiness, beauty, love, health, power and influence. Do these things really make us content with who we are? Do they? I urge anyone to challenge me for saying that we can chase after these things, only to lose them. 

The question that remains is whether helping people, or even emancipating the rights of the marginalised bring happiness.  Sometimes, we can have so much freedom and yet be unhappy. Having such freedom or even protection of human dignity may lead to happiness, but such a framework is not enough to justify why the law should care for the rights of others. 

What happened Last Night?

Your face is filled with sweat and you pant as you walk into the bathroom to get dressed into your best clothes. With high heels, you tether into the room where people chatter loquaciously, people danced in a circle and people hanging onto someone they think they are attracted to, but are not sure if they are, but they hang onto them just in case. Above all, you see people kissing. Yes, people who don't know each other kiss. Hard. Not only do they do it with one person, they do it with more than one person on the same night.
Girls spread nasty rumours about girls who have found favour with the boys. Boy fight with boys who the girls find charming. What's more? School-aged children (yes, children) get involved in this type of activity.

Kissing is now casual. Anyone who has not kissed more than one person by the age of 18 is considered not only abnormal, but a self-righteous, moralistic bigot. Sex is now casual. Anyone who believes sex before marriage is wrong is not only abnormal, but naive, conservative, and even self-righteous. Gone are the days of moral codes and honoring others. Sounds good, doesn't it? No, it does not. In any society which thrives on sexual freedom, people and families suffer. Men, women and children have been destroyed by such conduct because sexual relations ties people together. When such ties are broken, people are hurt. People seek to get their own way and seek revenge.

Welcome of the world of sexual freedom and sexual rights.

Human rights are Relative

What is regarded as a legitimate right or not a legitimate right is relative in this world. This is the standard of the world - rights are relative. Most accept rights to be how they themselves see it and not accordingly to a set of universal objective standards. This accounts for the increasing tension between different groups over rights are people entitled to.

Human rights are rights according to how humans see their rights and therefore, are typically focused on self-interest rather than caring or understanding others. This is the core of most of the 21st century campaigns. Many 21st century human rights activists point the finger at groups which insist that rights are derived from objective and universal moral standards for being against human rights. The term 'human rights' is the perhaps the most spoken about, and most emotionally charged issue in the modern world.

The West has criticised non-Western nations like China and Russia for lack of human rights defined according to Western values. It had criticised China for taking away the rights of the people to vote and Russia for its laws regarding homosexual propaganda. It has criticised India for female genital mutilation and the Middle East for restricting the way women dress. However, just like how one can criticise others for disrespecting human rights according to one's own standards, others can do the same in return. What is perceived as a right is based on the cultural and religious values one has. Rights are no simple issues.

It seems that the West, in criticising other countries for not respecting human rights can be in turn be seen to be guilty for some of its practices. Asian, African and Middle Eastern countries may criticise the West for its usury and sexual ethics from their perspectives. However, they don't because they do not see how their culture is superior over others.