We have the right to beat up anyone we want (3)

Satire of Australians continued.

We have the right to get drunk
Drunks get violent
We love getting drunk
So we should have the right to do anything we want
Including the right to beat up anyone who we hate
We beat up international students
Because they are Asian
We also beat up Aborigines who will beat us up
And Africans too
Because they are not included
As they are not Australian in our eyes
Dress up in whatever we want
On a Saturday night
But others do not have a right to do so

We have the right to get smashed, because we like it (2)

This series of posts is a satire of Australians, dedicated to Australians.

We have the right to get smashed
Because we love to get smashed
Getting to the hospital
At 2am
Liver is dead
I'm the drinking queen (or king)
Celebrate my drunkeness with my friends
Dead liver makes me a queen (or king)
Anyone who doesn't get smashed
Is just a loser, loser, loser
That's right
A loser, loser, loser
Because they are missing out!
On getting smashed
How we love to get smashed!

We Hate Labouring but like to for the Status and Pleasure (1)

The following series of posts is dedicated to Australians who love to complain about their rights. It can be sung as a song, rap or poem

I need  money and status
I need love and relationship
So I go to work and work
But swear at my co-workers
I slap my boss in the face
Getting with my secret lover
In front of all others
To make them feel jealous
I had too much to drink on Thursdays and Fridays
And every other night
So I take my sickie - what a beauty!
That's why I work
When I hate labour, I love parties and fighting
That's why I party!!!!
YEEEEEEEAAHHHHHH!!!!!

Marriages Case Study (1)

Ralph was a conservative who attended a graduate school having a predominantly liberal culture. There he fell in love with a woman who was quite liberal and held a very different set of values. He married her, but within six months he realized he had made a mistake, and within a year filed for divorce.

However, Ralph belonged to a church that does not accept divorce, and it took him another four grueling years to obtain an annulment.

What became the worst experience of his life could have been avoided had he realized the benefits of marrying a conservative.

As liberals typically believe in rights rather than obligations, they are more likely to get satisfaction from making their spouses feel miserable and to use violence against them. Violence by liberalists against non-liberalists, especially that by women, is more likely to be socially accepted.

Source: Conservapedia.com

The Enemy of Big Government is a Happy Stable Family

Why is it that socialistic governments support government-funded birth control? Birth control funded by the government encourages people to engage in more extramarital sex, increasing the chance of single parenthood, in particular, single motherhood.

Statistics shows that nonmarried households have a higher rate of living in poverty than married households. This can be explained by the greater stability of a family which has married parents. Poverty places a family in a position of dependency on the government, providing the government grounds to provide them welfare, further feeding dependency on the governments. Such governments encourage such dependency of families in poverty as means of maintaining their voting stock.

This dependency can be broken by increasing solidity of families which would involve parents who are married, not merely in a relationship where one can leave another. But wait, marriage is now meaningless because marriage is now a mere contract. No wonder so many people do not want to marry.

Political Correctness is Social Tyranny

Political correctness imposes on all individuals a set of standards which ensure that no group is offended by compelling all individuals to embrace all ideologies and beliefs. Offence is anything that is opposed to the beliefs, actions or goals of those worthy of politically correct protection: those that tolerate all other beliefs or have common beliefs with those who claim to tolerate all other beliefs.

Extract from Liberalism Spells the Demise of Morality 

To be Discriminated Against is the New Black

No one likes to be discriminated against. Of course, you may say, no one likes it. But why is it so fashionable to scream 'DISCRIMINATION!' in Australia, as though it was something to be proud of? Because it gets one attention from the media and makes people feel guilty about their "higher" social status (as the "victim" constructs it). It is so fashionable to be discriminated against the Australia.

Walking Down the Street

You breath, eat and drink it everyday. You ooze it through your pores as you see the latest rap music filled with profane language. You see scantily clad images of people in advertisements. Your teacher or lecturer tells you that there are no moral absolutes. You walk past a club full of drunk people. As you drive further into the city, the number of brothels you drive past cannot be counted without slowly walking down the streets. When night closes in, you hear the screams of a woman as she is being sexually assault. You see a young man bloodied by a gang. You see an elderly man being bashed by a gang.

What do these actions have in common?

Write down what you think in the comment box below.

Critique of Melinda Tankard Reist's 'We must follow France and Put an End to Exploitation'

Melinda Tankard Reist has been described as a conservative feminist, (whatever that means) who fights against abortion, pornography and violence. While these are plausible goals, one could argue that her focus is too narrow by excluding boys and men who are subject to pornography. Furthermore, it can be argued that she assumes that all women in prostitution do so involuntarily.

 In her article, We must follow France and Put an End to Exploitation, she uses the death of Tracy Connelly as a example to suggest that all prostitutes want a way out. However, there are many who do it for the easy money and pleasure in any country. She also asks why the government has not made legislated to help prostitutes on the grounds that they are exploited as though only prostitutes are the only people in the world being exploited. While it is absolutely wrong to exploit anyone at all, it is not merely governmental responsibility to stop exploitation. The community has a larger responsibility in preventing exploitation by teaching children family and community values as the government is not a body that can stop everything immoral.

The ultimate silence that Reist makes is that prostitution damages men and children, not just women. It destroys families. What destroys men destroys families, what destroys families destroys communities, what destroys communities destroys a nation. This silence is deafening and so it appears that Reist is only trying to put forward her self-righteous agenda which only focuses on a favoured section of the community, rather than the community as a whole.

Any fight against the vices of the world needs to be done out of love for all others including those who are unlovable and cruel, not out of a legalistic sense of duty or moral outrage.

"We live and work to party"

There is no such thing as obligation. Only material possessions and power that one can enjoy exist. There is no obligation to pay debts including government debts. Anyone who is to be my life partner has to always agree with me and give me everything I want. I am entitled to force them to be of me and owned by me. I can sleep with anyone I want, financially "rape" anyone I want, and make a slave of anyone I want, dress up in anyway  want. It is my right as I say and anyone who says otherwise is just a moralistic conservative hypocrite. Immigrants and ethnic minorities are the weeds of our society who deserve nothing but extermination. That's why we support abortion and eugenics. We are all animals and so there is no such thing as objective morality for us, only morality as the most powerful individuals dictate. That's why we need to fight hard for power over all others. 

- liberalist, politically correct typical Generation Y Australian

Imagine a Boot Stamping on a Human Face

Imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever. This is what Big Brother said to Winston, the protagonist of George Orwell's 1984 who sought to resist a totalitarian government, but tragically failed to do so. Sadly enough, one need not imagine such a violent oppressive act. One need only see what is happening through the news and by personal observation.

Australia is becoming increasingly violent. A man stomped on someone's head as a act of violence in New South Wales. This is only one is many cases of violence. However, such acts of violence against a man is not portrayed by the media as something that is shocking or even unacceptable. It is portrayed as something normal and tolerable, fueling a culture of violence. Only acts of violence against Australian women are portrayed as unacceptable and worthy of condemnation, whereas acts of violence against all others are unworthy of any media attention. In addition to this, speaking out against the media for omitting such acts is considered 'sacrilege' in our culture because speaking out about media bias towards its favourite group incites 'violence against (read: Australian) women'.

Silence about evil is worse than the act of evil itself. Thus, the media is a boot that stamps on the faces of certain groups by politicising the suffering of others.  The media is the root of all hypocritical "benevolence".

It's so Fashionable to be a Child/Youth Worker (yes, in Australia)

Many teenagers from the age of 14 to young adults of university age are employed in casual jobs. I understand that not everyone is there for the money, but I do understand that many of them, but not all, have the motive of competing with their friends in terms of their career prospects. A girl once told me that she wanted to work because you 'need to work your way up'. She is one of many who is a materialist and a hedonist. This quest for power is the same for the quest for riches as they are both material possessions. Many people think that serving the boss is something worthwhile, while helping one's family members and serving one's family is slavery. It is this disdain of helping the family that many think it is fashionable to start working early - to fight for power and money.

I am not in any way saying it is wrong to work while young. I am pointing out the attitude of many young people whose motive to work is a means of seeking power and money.

Australian Universities: A Breeding Ground for Wild Stupid and Inappropriate Behaviour

Australian universities are the cornerstone of the Australian economy. (Whether the economy is boosted by future workers, that is , generation Y is a different matter. However, they are also a breeding ground for wild people. Many Australian university student (ie. the culturally Australian locals, not ethnic minorities born in Australia or international students) not only participate in, but celebrate wild behaviour, such as doing 'inappropriate things behind closed doors'. Anyone who does not support or condone these things is deemed to be a backwards, stupid, naive, retarded idiot by majority of university students. The older generation of Australians often point out and are shocked at how wild university students have become. It is true that there were some wild university students in those days, but such wild behaviour was not cultural.

The wild young people think they are invincible because they are too proud to see how they must face the consequence or accept responsibility and they think they are so sophisticated by doing these things, only to find out they are not as invincible as they really are. How sophisticated are the wild partiers. It would not be surprising if the future Australian economy suffocates, because Generation Y is a generation of hedonists who are self-entitled and only know of fighting for one's rights.

Beware the Nice Sweet Person

There has been a great deal of campaigns in Australia regarding violence, that is, violence against (Australian?) women but not violence against other groups. Violence is force used against someone such that the victim is unable to resist it, to control the behaviour of the subject in the long term or short term. Physical acts which perpetrate such force are obvious, but verbal abuse is not. This is because it is hard to determine whether verbal messages cause someone to behaviour accordingly to another's will. Furthermore, behaving according to the will of another may not necessarily be done out of lack of individual autonomy.

The signs of a violent person are:

• repetitive or constant swearing
• immodest dressing
• often gathering together with people who are aggressive
• intentionally rude gestures
• unsympathetic 
• appreciation/taste for crude jokes, especially jokes which make fun of oppression or weakness of others, but yet feel offended when people make jokes about them
• attempting to spread ideology that picks on only certain groups while forgetting it own group regarding violence e.g. feminism, in particular Australian feminism

If there is one piece of advice I could give you, it would be that people who seem nice and demand good respectful treatment, usually in a way which makes you feel bad because you know you haven't done anything wrong are the people who can be trusted the LEAST. There are many people like this at the university I attend, and perhaps in the whole country. The domestic university student population is largely representative of Australian youth. This  should remind you of certain people. The Jezebel spirit has entrapped Australian society.

Corruption in Australia

To many Australians i.e. the average politically uninformed Australians, corruption is very rare or occurs very infrequently in Australia, at least compared to other countries. Don't be deceived by the media. The Australian media often brushes over corruption such as that committed by Eddie Obeid and Gordon Nuttall. Don't forget the Fitzgerald inquiry which sought to investigate widespread corruption. Now, the new government has announced a taskforce to investigate customs corruption. Corruption is not confined to monetary transactions. Failing to report something that an official is obliged to report can be argued to amount to corruption.

Distracted by Trivia

When a population becomes distracted by trivia, when cultural life is redefined as a perpetual round of entertainments, when serious public conversation becomes a form of baby-talk, when, in short, a people become an audience, and their public business a vaudeville act, then a nation finds itself at risk; culture-death is a clear possibility - Neil Postman

Doesn't this remind you of the Australian media, and in particular, media focused on only the attention of fashion, celebrities, careers and all the other material things? It does, doesn't it? And also, Australian politics, especially when Julia Gillard was campaigning to be elected in 2013?

What Discrimination Really is

Australians yell out "discrimination" every time their self-perceived entitlement or  "right" is "violated". There is no such thing as a "right"  in the objective universal sense. There are only categorical imperatives to do or not do so certain things. Thus, discrimination cannot arise when one's right is violated, it only occurs when people break the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives are what every person must follow for the imperative to operate universally. This is the core of the Kantian theory of ethics. Discrimination occurs when people treat some more harshly or lenient than others with respect to fulfilling these obligations.

Of course, for a country in which obligations are foreign, and any call for obligation is equated to slavery, no one in Australia would understand this, except for a very few.

Australia: The land where the victim can be in a "dominant" group

Australia is very pro-minoritarian country, in particular feminist and full of violence. Political correctness and postmodern moral relativism are the two culprits that are responsible for such evil perverted ideologies. One in three victims of domestic violence is a man. Men are silenced from speaking out about violence perpetrated against them by a close female partner or family member. Academia has turned a blind eye to this social reality in the name of advancing the ideology of liberalism - that morality is relative, and that those who are of 'dominant' groups (whatever that means) are always to blame. This idea itself is corrupt. Welcome to decadent Australia.

I strongly recommend you check out this link. http://www.unimondo.org/Notizie/Australia.-Quando-la-vittima-porta-i-pantaloni-143151. The author, Daniela Bandelli is an Italian journalist who specialises in social issues and is conducting a PhD on gender violence discourses. 

Daniela blogs at http://danielabandelli.wordpress.com.
Her LinkedIn profile can be found at : http://au.linkedin.com/pub/daniela-bandelli/7/b46/558.

Typical Australian-style hypocrisy

Female doctors accuse pro-life doctor Mark Hobart of anti-abortion campaign after he refused a couple an abortion on the grounds that is was the killing of  a (baby) human as all abortions are. These doctors were saying that there were against sex-selective abortion, only on the grounds of gender. However, if it was not, it would be justifiable because it is a "choice" and the "right" to "control" one's body. A baby is not part of the mother's body. It has its own body.  Nothing to it. The views of those doctors if they were aborted themselves, would be completely different - in fact, quite the opposite. Abortion is murder. Yet, doctors claim it is need to save a life, but it does not take away the fact that it is the killing of a person. The hypocrisy of doctors who have these views smells of rotting stench. One could reasonably suspect that these feminist doctors would support the abortion of a boy for being a boy, but not a girl for being a girl. That is what feminism is.

Abortion is wrong for being what it is. Discrimination is also wrong, but not the reason why abortion is wrong in itself.

Top 10 Most Annoying phrases

There are many annoying phrases in the Australian language. These phrases are a manifestation of liberalism and individualism which stench is that of rotting carcass:

1. I can do whatever I want
2. Are you going to the [name of bar, hotel] to get drunk?
3. Did you slap him/her?
4. Who did you get with?
5. I had a great one night stand
6. I want pay rise [but I don't want to work  harder]
7. I should get whatever I want
8. I demand the right to do whatever I want
9. I can say whatever I want
10. I can go whatever I want [and I get angry when people inquire because it is offensive]

Yet, people who use these phrases get angry when people who they deem to be "others" use them. How hypocritical!