Why all this immorality in the World?

We live in times where immorality is rampant. Immorality has always been rampant. Immorality comes from human nature - it is part of humanity's fallen nature. This is why we have war, violence, fraud , corruption and hatred. Some people have attempted to find links between science and morality and found that morality is linked to an understanding of science. This is rubbish. A person can have great knowledge but do the most evil things and this can be observed.

The cycle of revenge is based on the feeling that one needs to satisfy one's anger and wrath. It is self-centred. This leads to all the conflicts in the world.

"Words can't be used to create meaning", says the postmodernist

Words can't be used to create meaning, right? That is what the postmodernist would say. Saying that "words can't be used to create meaning", is not only contradictory is itself; it allows people to twist the meaning of certain terms, such as freedom and justice. The motive of making such as statement is typically to shut down what others say, and replace it with the meaning one likes, rather than what is true.

This axiom explains why people these days are so sensitive towards words in general. They interpret the meaning of the word according to how they feel or believe it should be, rather than its true or intended meaning.

Backlash?

Sweden, reportedly, has an oppressive radical feminist government. According to the writer of the blog, Why I Left Sweden,  despite high living standards that are the envy of the world, the culture is one that is oppressive, particularly towards men. People often think that their actions will not have consequences, but they do. A video in Sweden depicts a group of young women who not only murdered a man, but celebrated it. Videos, and the media generally indicate the culture of a country, but not always. Could this possibly explain any rise in violence against women and rape in Sweden, or any other feminist country for that matter?

Political Correctness is Social Tyranny

Political correctness imposes on all individuals a set of standards which ensure that no group is offended by compelling all individuals to embrace all ideologies and beliefs. Offence is anything that is opposed to the beliefs, actions or goals of those worthy of politically correct protection: those that tolerate all other beliefs or have common beliefs with those who claim to tolerate all other beliefs.

Extract from Liberalism Spells the Demise of Morality 

The Only Truth is that...There is no truth - How contradictory

To say that there is no one truth but many truths regarding the same object or subject is to say that the truth is defined by what the individual believes is the truth. In postmodern logic, "truth" is what one believes. This leads to moral conflicts as to what is right and what is wrong. Many postmodernists believe that absolutists are crazy, extremist and psychotic for believing that truth is absolute. Well, to say that the only truth is no truth is perhaps even crazier and extreme. Above all, it is self-contradictory. And, many people apply postmodernism to their lives.

Since there is no Truth, seeking respect and "justice" is dependent on power.

Welcome to the (Weird) Postmodern World

Postmodernism is the ideology that there is no 'one truth', but many truths. Truths can exist only in the mind of an individual. That is the only truth that postmodernism purports: that there is no one truth. Thus, it follows that language cannot be used to create meaning, but that meaning is determined solely by the individual's perception. There is no real reality, but that the real existence of something exists only in one's own mind.  Everything that is said is a bias, and so therefore everyone thought of is a bias since there are no truths. Truth no longer guides us to shape our principles and values. Justice is now a matter of politics.

Welcome to the weird postmodern world.

Foreign Intervention is Stupid, Useless and Garbage! (unless it is to acquire more resources)

Some silly people think that their government needs to involve itself with military means in the internal political affairs of other countries. They think that not doing so amounts to allowing atrocities to happen. It may seem like so on the surface, but such silly naive people do not realise that military intervention (or foreign intervention) not only worsens the situation, but that war is murder. Yet these people claim that they helping to reduce murders in war. That I need to even write this goes to show how naive and politically useless some people are.

To say military intervention is a moral obligation is to say that one must report to the principal of one's own school how two people from another school are fighting, especially when that school has its own principal.

"We live and work to party"

There is no such thing as obligation. Only material possessions and power that one can enjoy exist. There is no obligation to pay debts including government debts. Anyone who is to be my life partner has to always agree with me and give me everything I want. I am entitled to force them to be of me and owned by me. I can sleep with anyone I want, financially "rape" anyone I want, and make a slave of anyone I want, dress up in anyway  want. It is my right as I say and anyone who says otherwise is just a moralistic conservative hypocrite. Immigrants and ethnic minorities are the weeds of our society who deserve nothing but extermination. That's why we support abortion and eugenics. We are all animals and so there is no such thing as objective morality for us, only morality as the most powerful individuals dictate. That's why we need to fight hard for power over all others. 

- liberalist, politically correct typical Generation Y Australian

Darwinism (4): Practical Applications of Darwinism

Darwinism has been applied by fascists and dictators to dehumanise people - literally. Hitler argued that Jews were not people by using pseudo-scientific arguments that drew from Darwinist evolution. Mao and Stalin used Darwinism to justify the mass murders of their own people.

For Counterexamples to Evolution see: http://conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Evolution

Hidden Pride

Many people in the West insist on foreign intervention. Some even believe that a country that does not become involved in such intervention is a bad evil country. However, many who think this way fail to see how no sides of a conflict is completely innocent. These pro-intervention people argue that governments must help where possible, but fail to see that it is a matter between the parties involved in the conflict to resolve the conflict themselves as they are in the best possible position. In addition to this, such intervention may stir up more conflict and increase, not decrease social stability. Ultimately, seeing the need to intervention because one's own country can resolve such conflicts is based on the prideful belief that one is superior. This is why so many countries in the Africa and Asia, as well as the Middle East see the West as a cunning enemy, not a benevolent power.

Beware the anti-PC Crusade, says the liberals

The liberals at university self-righteously express concern with people who are against PC. For those of you who don't know what PC is, it is political correctness. The anti-PC crusaders are fighting against PC because they believe PC shuts down debate. However, one can argue that these anti-anti-PC crusaders are the ones trying to shut down debate against them, while opening up more "debate" (read: indoctrinating propaganda) for themselves. How open-minded are the anti-anti-PC crusaders.

Unlimited Rights

It seems as though, in the postmodernised world, everything is possible as there is no right or wrong. Hence, paedophilia may one day be regarded as a right since there is no absolute right or wrong. It would be before we know it, a group of paedophilic oversexed academics gather together to form the Children and Adult Love organisation to promote "loving" relationships between children and adults, and there would be the paedophile (or in PC terms: child-lovers) rights movement. The term 'paedophile' would be changed to child-lovers to push forward the movement.

The One and Only Alfonzo Rachel

Alfonzo Rachel may be a social conservative, but he is not the 'typical' social conservative that many anti-conservatives or liberals may make him out to be. He is witty, intelligent, humourous (because he is political humourist) and above all, he does not judge those who have different views from him. Instead, he kindly and gently expresses his stance on a range of political issues including welfare, gay marriage, racial politics and the liberal education agenda using moral logic. He is upfront, honest and does not hide his opinion.

For an alternative analysis of politics, check out his website at: http://alfonzorachel.com/.

Foreign Intervention = Asking for Trouble

Many people in the West assume that they are capable of helping countries ravaged by civil war and should attempt to help such countries accordingly. However, civil wars are never simple and both sides have a self-interested agenda, whether they be the government, rebels or juntas. People who fight against others have an agenda to advance their own means whether it be for a good intention or a bad intention. Of course, some will criticise this argument as one which is attempting to find an excuse for not 'helping' others. Fighting always involves harming or hurting others, something that is completely against helping others for their good. Using harm to fight others from harming others does not enable one to help others. The need to 'help' others has been used hypocritically by the West to show its "altruism" to gain support from the weaker countries, only to find that these countries often resent the West even more than they did before foreign intervention.

Human Rights are Self-rationalisation Tool

Human rights is the idol of the modern world. People scream about violation of their "human rights" as soon as their pursuit of their self-interests or those of their allies have been violated. However, they turn a blind eye and even justify the same act they condemned when others are subject to the same treatment. Therefore, human rights have been used as a tool of rationalising one's interests. This is what 'human rights' are for. It is to advance the humanist agenda of progression.

Conversations with Liberals about PC

Below are my experiences with liberals on campus about the concept of political correctness and its implications:

One guy told me that the term 'political correctness' is a "derogatory" term used by the 'right' against the left. The other guy with him said that he supports political correctness. I explained that we are trying to get people to analyse and think about whether we need political correctness. I told them that people these days are very confused about what 'tolerance', 'discrimination', etc means. I gently told them that we seek to explore what these terms mean as these terms have been twisted around to serve the self-interests of particular groups who claim to serve all. 

One woman, who must be a liberal/progressive was saying how we need political correctness to stop people from being "discriminatory". She interrogated me (literally), by aggressively asking me to apply examples of situations where political correctness is dangerous. I told her immediately that PC can be used to legitimise inappropriate or evil behaviour like paedophilia. "Political correctness can be used by paedophiles to justify the "right" to paedophilia," I said. She nodded in agreement. There was no choice, but to nod.

I was telling a girl I know from the the Reform Party about how we are starting up a think tank to discuss political correctness. I did not tell her it was called 'Stop Political Correctness'.  She said it sounds exciting and that she would be willing to participate. She demonstrates an understanding of political correctness and supports it. She also told me in a self-righteous manner that she would be concerned about people who are trying to stop political correctness rather than political correctness itself. Such is expected from a liberal. 

Interference with the Affairs of Others is Utterly Unnecessary and Stupid

Interfering with the private or personal affairs of others has become a socially and politically fashionable trend in the Australia. Whether you critique the beliefs of another culture, political group or religion, or, make a statement about how hard or annoying you find another to be, you are sure to have someone reprimand you for doing so as if it was a demonic evil thing you were doing. I've had that happen to me before. Forget about whether the person is in a position to understand what you are saying, it is absolutely patronising. It is also insulting when the person does not understand the framework from which you operate and they criticise you for being "intolerant", "bigoted" or being "unhelpful". The legitimate critiques people make are a private affair and need no reprimanding, and therefore unnecessary.

The only criticism that deserve criticism for being criticism are the ones that attempt to stop itself from being critiqued.

Why Politics is Inevitable

Politics is about seeking one's own self-interests. It inevitably involves manipulating others to push one's interests across. In doing so, lying, deceit and misleading propaganda is needed. However, not all political groups are the same. Some seek self-interests using an ethical manner, but most don't. As humans are all inherently selfish, politics is inevitable in this world whether one likes it or not.

Beware the Nice Sweet Person

There has been a great deal of campaigns in Australia regarding violence, that is, violence against (Australian?) women but not violence against other groups. Violence is force used against someone such that the victim is unable to resist it, to control the behaviour of the subject in the long term or short term. Physical acts which perpetrate such force are obvious, but verbal abuse is not. This is because it is hard to determine whether verbal messages cause someone to behaviour accordingly to another's will. Furthermore, behaving according to the will of another may not necessarily be done out of lack of individual autonomy.

The signs of a violent person are:

• repetitive or constant swearing
• immodest dressing
• often gathering together with people who are aggressive
• intentionally rude gestures
• unsympathetic 
• appreciation/taste for crude jokes, especially jokes which make fun of oppression or weakness of others, but yet feel offended when people make jokes about them
• attempting to spread ideology that picks on only certain groups while forgetting it own group regarding violence e.g. feminism, in particular Australian feminism

If there is one piece of advice I could give you, it would be that people who seem nice and demand good respectful treatment, usually in a way which makes you feel bad because you know you haven't done anything wrong are the people who can be trusted the LEAST. There are many people like this at the university I attend, and perhaps in the whole country. The domestic university student population is largely representative of Australian youth. This  should remind you of certain people. The Jezebel spirit has entrapped Australian society.

Corruption in Australia

To many Australians i.e. the average politically uninformed Australians, corruption is very rare or occurs very infrequently in Australia, at least compared to other countries. Don't be deceived by the media. The Australian media often brushes over corruption such as that committed by Eddie Obeid and Gordon Nuttall. Don't forget the Fitzgerald inquiry which sought to investigate widespread corruption. Now, the new government has announced a taskforce to investigate customs corruption. Corruption is not confined to monetary transactions. Failing to report something that an official is obliged to report can be argued to amount to corruption.