Hollywood Exposed (3): Boys gone Mad

Similarly, Hollywood is full of bad boys who glorify violence, drunkness, misogyny and aggression. They encourage boys to degrade themselves by getting smashed, taking drugs, being violent and breaking the law.

However, they have been judged more than Hollywood bad girls. Much judgment has been directed towards them by women's groups to claim to seek ending the exploitation of women and girls. Why do such activists not criticise the Hollywood women who are equally bad, and influence young women to degrade themselves? It is because they think women are 'morally superior'.

What people see on screen has a much greater effect than one knows. Until one is shocked into seeing how much one is influenced by TV, one will be influenced by it.

Marriages Case Study (4)

Elizabeth was a smart liberal who knew she would be better off marrying a conservative than a liberal like herself. She found one in Stan, a conservative who was a very hard worker and who did not have the luxury of time to develop the social skills that Elizabeth had.

Stan's circle of friends and acquaintances were limited, and he thought all women were liberal. He married Elizabeth thinking that all women were liberal like her.

For the next thirty years Elizabeth censored Stan's conservative comments, interfered with his conservative activities, and caused problems for Stan at every political turn. But Stan thought all women were that way, and rarely complained.

Tragically, Elizabeth became sick and died. Stan then remarried, this time to a conservative woman whom he did not even realize existed. For the rest of his life Stan marveled at how different -- and better -- his life was.

Watch out for people who like you only because of your good values, but unaccepting and intolerant of your shortcomings. People who love you only because of your 'good' values, whatever it means of them, are people who see you as a means to use you for their own good. They will not support you during your hard times unless it is to their benefit.

Do not envy those people who appear to have a good marriage, but only remain together because of the material gain both parties receive. Beware those who are politically correct, unless you can tolerate pro-political correctness people, perhaps because you yourself support political correctness. 

For people who are not pro-political correctness, do not, for goodness sake, marry a pro-political correctness person. He (or she, for PC's sake), will restrict your freedom of thought, beliefs, expression, speech and actions merely because he believes it is "immoral" or "wrong" when they are in fact, not wrong, or even, moral. Moral absolutism is typically a foreign concept for pro-PC people, and whenever they deem some act to be wrong in the absolute sense, it is typically out of hypocrisy. 

People who make Legitimate Politically Incorrect Criticisms are Socially "Inappropriate"

A typical situation in high school would be when another person, usually a 'popular' girl in my experience reprimanding someone for being socially "inappropriate", whatever "inappropriate" means. These days in the postmodern era, speaking for the truth whether it involves criticism of false doctrines is met with a backlash. Only for making legitimate criticism about a doctrine by attacking their logic. Most of the people who make such reprimandings are typically people who do not understand the doctrine or beliefs being criticised, and yet think that they are right to interfere with the freedom of speech of others. These people are typically very legalistic, and believe that the as long as something is socially acceptable, it is morally right. It seems that these people are the ones who need reprimanding. They are infected by the virus of political correctness.

These people, in my experience, typically become prefects in Australian schools because they are seen as
more "responsible" for having the initiative to call someone out for merely saying something true but not accepted as true. No wonder, our society is becoming more morally deluded because schools instill legalistic hypocritical politically correct values in students. It all starts in the educational system.

"We live and work to party"

There is no such thing as obligation. Only material possessions and power that one can enjoy exist. There is no obligation to pay debts including government debts. Anyone who is to be my life partner has to always agree with me and give me everything I want. I am entitled to force them to be of me and owned by me. I can sleep with anyone I want, financially "rape" anyone I want, and make a slave of anyone I want, dress up in anyway  want. It is my right as I say and anyone who says otherwise is just a moralistic conservative hypocrite. Immigrants and ethnic minorities are the weeds of our society who deserve nothing but extermination. That's why we support abortion and eugenics. We are all animals and so there is no such thing as objective morality for us, only morality as the most powerful individuals dictate. That's why we need to fight hard for power over all others. 

- liberalist, politically correct typical Generation Y Australian

Darwinism (5): The Ultimate Justification of Eugenics and Abortion (including Sex-Selection Abortion)

As we are all animals who have no value, according to the Darwinism theory, eugenics, the extermination of an unwanted part of the population whether it be ethnic minorities or girls, is totally legitimate. Why? Because no human deserves any respect if that is the case. Eugenics, abortion, population control and birth control come together. 

Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger who once said "We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population." Yep, that's right. The eugenicist had the intention of providing abortion to exterminate a certain race for being of that race. This is the height of racism. She and others eugenicists founded Planned Parenthood and justified abortion on the ground that it "helps" women. 

Abortion is a means of putting a woman through pain and guilt, and the killing of a baby. It allows irresponsible fathers to shift the responsibility of looking after a child to the mother. Abortion is a right? No. It is not. It is does not merely incite violence against women and children: it IS violence against women and children. Yet, the liberals who claim to be so against violence against women support it.

Abortion clinics are killing machines. It is time they shut down. It is the ultimate exploitation of women, and the killing of innocent people. 

Sources: 

The Ultimate Exploitation of Women: Abortion, by Brian E Fisher

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC97E8D2162EBAFBD - Investigation of Planned Parenthood which condones sex-selection abortion (of girls) despite claiming it seeks to "help" women.

Darwinism (4): Practical Applications of Darwinism

Darwinism has been applied by fascists and dictators to dehumanise people - literally. Hitler argued that Jews were not people by using pseudo-scientific arguments that drew from Darwinist evolution. Mao and Stalin used Darwinism to justify the mass murders of their own people.

For Counterexamples to Evolution see: http://conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Evolution

The Perpetual Jail Kid

The prisoner was once a kid,
A young innocent kid
Who knew not his father, but only his mother
Who beat him, knived him, skulled him
In the name of Independence
And who expected only yearly payments
Who demanded the government give her
Not what she needed, but what she thought she needed
The now grown kid
Learnt only how to take, but not to give
How to envy the workers, but not how to work
How to trash, but not how to clean up one's act
Now he is the perpetual jail kid.
Who knows no values and morals

Had he had a known father
Who could have loved him ,and cared for him
Who knows where he may now be?
But, it was too sad,
One may only blame his parents
For their irresponsible selfish acts
To satisfy their pleasure
The fruit of their desire
A rotten delinquent, a
A perpetual jail kid

Liberal journalists Assume they are Superior

The liberal media loves to control what people think. They call it their job because they think they are superior to everyone, especially since they are anything but 'conservative' - the dirtiest word in liberal vocabulary. CNN Desperately Defends Obama's Relationship with Radical Professor is a classic example. The journalist tells a person with an alternative view about the Critical Race Theory that he doesn't understand the Theory. She reminds me of Leigh Sales and Chris Uhlmann. Leigh Sales, in particular, likes to repeat questions to a people she does not agree with simply because she thinks she is so smart, open-minded and superior, only to find her enemies turn the tables on her.

Unlimited Rights

It seems as though, in the postmodernised world, everything is possible as there is no right or wrong. Hence, paedophilia may one day be regarded as a right since there is no absolute right or wrong. It would be before we know it, a group of paedophilic oversexed academics gather together to form the Children and Adult Love organisation to promote "loving" relationships between children and adults, and there would be the paedophile (or in PC terms: child-lovers) rights movement. The term 'paedophile' would be changed to child-lovers to push forward the movement.

Imagine a Boot Stamping on a Human Face

Imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever. This is what Big Brother said to Winston, the protagonist of George Orwell's 1984 who sought to resist a totalitarian government, but tragically failed to do so. Sadly enough, one need not imagine such a violent oppressive act. One need only see what is happening through the news and by personal observation.

Australia is becoming increasingly violent. A man stomped on someone's head as a act of violence in New South Wales. This is only one is many cases of violence. However, such acts of violence against a man is not portrayed by the media as something that is shocking or even unacceptable. It is portrayed as something normal and tolerable, fueling a culture of violence. Only acts of violence against Australian women are portrayed as unacceptable and worthy of condemnation, whereas acts of violence against all others are unworthy of any media attention. In addition to this, speaking out against the media for omitting such acts is considered 'sacrilege' in our culture because speaking out about media bias towards its favourite group incites 'violence against (read: Australian) women'.

Silence about evil is worse than the act of evil itself. Thus, the media is a boot that stamps on the faces of certain groups by politicising the suffering of others.  The media is the root of all hypocritical "benevolence".

Nasty, Hypocritical Pretentious Journalists - Typical (small 'l') liberals

Again, Leigh Sales engages in the ABC liberal-style advocacy journalism which hypocritically stands up for minorities, in this case, refugees. This is not to say she is the only journalist who does so, and so it would be unfair to say she is the only person who does so. However, she is the classic example of an advocacy journalist. Her interview with Immigration Minister Scott Morrison involved asking questions based on the assumption that her opinions are facts or, even worse, truth. She starts of with a leading question about the way 'asylum seekers' were treated, such that there is no way the interviewee can argue against her (superficial?) opinion without looking like he does not understand the question. When he tries to put forward his case, she cuts him off.

Sales, like many liberals, is like a growing child who assumes that anyone who disagrees with her, or tries to build a case against her is bad, evil or not to be trusted. Many liberals, one could suspect, feel sympathy for people who are deviant, or engage in illegal activity because they themselves are perhaps not strong enough or moral enough to follow the law where the law is morally and ethically sound.

People identify with people who have one thing in common with them and have no capacity to attack (having grounds to criticise) them tend to feel sympathy for them, or even think that the bad behaviour of people similar to them is justifiable. On the other hand, those who one perceives to be  capable of attacking them and have something in common with the perceived potential attacker are despised the most. This is perhaps why the media typically feels "sorry" for minority groups - because it makes them look like they are giving the minorities a voice.

Feminist Indoctrination and Double Standards

Many people do not realise how indoctrinated they are by feminism. Feminism has blinded people, including men and boys themselves to think that they are the ones who are responsible for all the 'plight of women'. Google searches reveal 10 ways the world is sexist against men and boys, such as how boys are expected to always give in to the wishes of their girlfriends no matter how pushy or manipulative she has been. As someone brought up in a more conservative culture, as opposed to the liberal Australia culture living in Australia, I can see very clearly the double standards against men. On the other hand, women in the Australia, and perhaps the West at large, are not in any way reprimanded for being manipulative. In fact, I have seen how such manipulation by Australian women is encouraged - regarded as a sign of a "strong, "independent" woman. This sort of manipulation is considered one of the most despicable character traits in cultures where there is an obligation of respect for all others, such as in Asia.

No wonder men do not want to marry and have lost respect for women in the West. It it all too understandable.

Why Politics is Inevitable

Politics is about seeking one's own self-interests. It inevitably involves manipulating others to push one's interests across. In doing so, lying, deceit and misleading propaganda is needed. However, not all political groups are the same. Some seek self-interests using an ethical manner, but most don't. As humans are all inherently selfish, politics is inevitable in this world whether one likes it or not.

Beware the Nice Sweet Person

There has been a great deal of campaigns in Australia regarding violence, that is, violence against (Australian?) women but not violence against other groups. Violence is force used against someone such that the victim is unable to resist it, to control the behaviour of the subject in the long term or short term. Physical acts which perpetrate such force are obvious, but verbal abuse is not. This is because it is hard to determine whether verbal messages cause someone to behaviour accordingly to another's will. Furthermore, behaving according to the will of another may not necessarily be done out of lack of individual autonomy.

The signs of a violent person are:

• repetitive or constant swearing
• immodest dressing
• often gathering together with people who are aggressive
• intentionally rude gestures
• unsympathetic 
• appreciation/taste for crude jokes, especially jokes which make fun of oppression or weakness of others, but yet feel offended when people make jokes about them
• attempting to spread ideology that picks on only certain groups while forgetting it own group regarding violence e.g. feminism, in particular Australian feminism

If there is one piece of advice I could give you, it would be that people who seem nice and demand good respectful treatment, usually in a way which makes you feel bad because you know you haven't done anything wrong are the people who can be trusted the LEAST. There are many people like this at the university I attend, and perhaps in the whole country. The domestic university student population is largely representative of Australian youth. This  should remind you of certain people. The Jezebel spirit has entrapped Australian society.

Corruption in Australia

To many Australians i.e. the average politically uninformed Australians, corruption is very rare or occurs very infrequently in Australia, at least compared to other countries. Don't be deceived by the media. The Australian media often brushes over corruption such as that committed by Eddie Obeid and Gordon Nuttall. Don't forget the Fitzgerald inquiry which sought to investigate widespread corruption. Now, the new government has announced a taskforce to investigate customs corruption. Corruption is not confined to monetary transactions. Failing to report something that an official is obliged to report can be argued to amount to corruption.

Two sides of a Coin

A conflict is like a coin in the sense that either side can be right in some ways, but neither is completely good and innocent. The side that is preferred according to how one sees it depends on external circumstances such as a wind blowing the coin such that it always lands in one direction. The modern media is like the wind. It can create spin (no pun intended) to favour one side and distort the picture. Information Clearing House is a great news outlet which reports the news that the average person would not see. Most people are probably not even aware of the tip of the iceberg of news stories reported in ICH. I strongly recommend you check it out. I also recommend Russia Today which is another great news outlet which presents stories which do not side any particular hegemony like the Australian media.

The Death of Truth

In a world which increasingly hates truth, political correctness has gained more followers. Political correctness is a tool for suppressing truth. These days, everyone is deemed to have a bias and people who understand the truth are regarded as people who have another "perspective". Sometimes, it is really not a matter of perspective. Some things are objectively and universally wrong, like murder whether it be a so-called "honour" killing or an abortion. Culture does not matter is circumstances like these.

What Discrimination Really is

Australians yell out "discrimination" every time their self-perceived entitlement or  "right" is "violated". There is no such thing as a "right"  in the objective universal sense. There are only categorical imperatives to do or not do so certain things. Thus, discrimination cannot arise when one's right is violated, it only occurs when people break the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives are what every person must follow for the imperative to operate universally. This is the core of the Kantian theory of ethics. Discrimination occurs when people treat some more harshly or lenient than others with respect to fulfilling these obligations.

Of course, for a country in which obligations are foreign, and any call for obligation is equated to slavery, no one in Australia would understand this, except for a very few.

Typical Australian-style hypocrisy

Female doctors accuse pro-life doctor Mark Hobart of anti-abortion campaign after he refused a couple an abortion on the grounds that is was the killing of  a (baby) human as all abortions are. These doctors were saying that there were against sex-selective abortion, only on the grounds of gender. However, if it was not, it would be justifiable because it is a "choice" and the "right" to "control" one's body. A baby is not part of the mother's body. It has its own body.  Nothing to it. The views of those doctors if they were aborted themselves, would be completely different - in fact, quite the opposite. Abortion is murder. Yet, doctors claim it is need to save a life, but it does not take away the fact that it is the killing of a person. The hypocrisy of doctors who have these views smells of rotting stench. One could reasonably suspect that these feminist doctors would support the abortion of a boy for being a boy, but not a girl for being a girl. That is what feminism is.

Abortion is wrong for being what it is. Discrimination is also wrong, but not the reason why abortion is wrong in itself.

Boredom and the Rise of Useless Organisations

Many people in the modern democracies work in jobs that they secretly believe are useless. This is possibly owing to the rise of the free tertiary education which has opened up the availability of degrees to do not provide one with technical skills which are required in any context such as art history and gender studies (yuck). These people probably find that they cannot capitalise their degree and take up useless jobs. As such, to give themselves a job, these people often get involved in useless social activism that is of no value because what they campaign about it rubbish. One could reasonably suspect that it is because many political and social issues in Australia deemed worthy of talking are just debated to be trendy or to show how many "rights" one has, by asking for more "rights".

Examples of useless organisations, websites, jobs, groups or people:

• Rights campaigners for the progressive social agenda

• People who scream "discrimination" because they didn't get a job they want

• www.mamamia.com.au - check it out to see how manipulative the writers are

• Journalists who "explore" the asylum seeker debate, "misogyny" of Australian politics

• Stupid gender quotas

• Breast enlargements and people who ask for them
• Models
• Beauty pageants
• Social commentators who talk about the fashion industry and celebrity life

These things all have one thing in common. The core of it is MATERIALISM. These things (or people) are useless who do nothing better but spend time thinking about how little they have, when they really have the resources to do such things. No wonder the Australian economy is backwards and Australia is really the laughing stock of the world. How do I know? I know the way people from non-Western countries talk about Australia. They point out how sick the culture is. Yet Australians praise themselves and say that others are merely envious, or do not understand what "rights" are. I can tell you, in countries, such as Asia, where people do not fight for rights, society is very stable and productive.