We have the right to get smashed, because we like it (2)

This series of posts is a satire of Australians, dedicated to Australians.

We have the right to get smashed
Because we love to get smashed
Getting to the hospital
At 2am
Liver is dead
I'm the drinking queen (or king)
Celebrate my drunkeness with my friends
Dead liver makes me a queen (or king)
Anyone who doesn't get smashed
Is just a loser, loser, loser
That's right
A loser, loser, loser
Because they are missing out!
On getting smashed
How we love to get smashed!

Interference with the Affairs of Others is Utterly Unnecessary and Stupid

Interfering with the private or personal affairs of others has become a socially and politically fashionable trend in the Australia. Whether you critique the beliefs of another culture, political group or religion, or, make a statement about how hard or annoying you find another to be, you are sure to have someone reprimand you for doing so as if it was a demonic evil thing you were doing. I've had that happen to me before. Forget about whether the person is in a position to understand what you are saying, it is absolutely patronising. It is also insulting when the person does not understand the framework from which you operate and they criticise you for being "intolerant", "bigoted" or being "unhelpful". The legitimate critiques people make are a private affair and need no reprimanding, and therefore unnecessary.

The only criticism that deserve criticism for being criticism are the ones that attempt to stop itself from being critiqued.

Beware the Nice Sweet Person

There has been a great deal of campaigns in Australia regarding violence, that is, violence against (Australian?) women but not violence against other groups. Violence is force used against someone such that the victim is unable to resist it, to control the behaviour of the subject in the long term or short term. Physical acts which perpetrate such force are obvious, but verbal abuse is not. This is because it is hard to determine whether verbal messages cause someone to behaviour accordingly to another's will. Furthermore, behaving according to the will of another may not necessarily be done out of lack of individual autonomy.

The signs of a violent person are:

• repetitive or constant swearing
• immodest dressing
• often gathering together with people who are aggressive
• intentionally rude gestures
• unsympathetic 
• appreciation/taste for crude jokes, especially jokes which make fun of oppression or weakness of others, but yet feel offended when people make jokes about them
• attempting to spread ideology that picks on only certain groups while forgetting it own group regarding violence e.g. feminism, in particular Australian feminism

If there is one piece of advice I could give you, it would be that people who seem nice and demand good respectful treatment, usually in a way which makes you feel bad because you know you haven't done anything wrong are the people who can be trusted the LEAST. There are many people like this at the university I attend, and perhaps in the whole country. The domestic university student population is largely representative of Australian youth. This  should remind you of certain people. The Jezebel spirit has entrapped Australian society.

The Ugly Face of Liberalism

Liberalism may seem to be tolerant. Not so. It blames dominant strong groups for the problems faced by the weaker minority groups. That's why it supports more government control - a government that can teach the dominant groups a "lesson" to share their wealth, while the privileged minorities get away with everything. Minorities in the modern Western world get away with everything from paedophilia, custody disputes, drunken crimes and tax evasion. Read the news if you don't believe me. The High Court has decided to take into account Aboriginality as a factor for the sentencing of a crime. How ridiculous is that - to take into race, no matter what race as a factor for the sentencing of a crime (before you call me a racist). Here's some good news though: A female paedophile will be jailed for what she DID.

Liberals are really just jealous of those who are stronger than them, and feel sympathy for weaker groups out of their own pride. In the words of Karl Marx, liberals are useful idiots. They can be used by anyone. That is why so many naive young uni students, political and apolitical, are liberals. It is because they are selfish, naive and not willing to accept reality.

The Perverse Progressives

Majority of people I have dealt with are perverse progressives whatever "progressive" means. Progressive seems to mean that one is very open-mined and liberal. This often means that is order for one to be progressive, one must forget the traditional values, that is family and community values and ensure that everyone complies with the new set that seeks to liberate people. This liberation is seen as good by many as it seems to mean that they are free to believe as they please, free to think as they please and free to say as they please. Majority of people think that it is the most liberating ideology which will create a harmonious, civilised and peaceful society. This is the stupidest and most perverse philosophy, no offence.

What is even more sad is that many people think it is perfectly normal. If one does as one pleases whenever one pleases and however one pleased, there will be people whose dignity is interfered with. This subverts the principle of equality that most people swear by. Yet, the majority thinks it is a good philosophy because it is "tolerant" and "open-minded". One does not need to be a conservative philosopher to see that is a a foolish, perverse philosophy. This is the disgusting core of liberalism.

Liberals (with a small 'l') think that conservatives are very narrow-minded, backwards, naive and foolish to believe that there must be a set of rules that society should live by, in terms of do's and don'ts. However, liberals themselves have a principle too - that one must not criticise others for their actions or beliefs because it is their beliefs and actions, such that no one should be criticised except those who opposes them, that is, the people against moral relativism. The liberals are really not as "open-minded" as they really are.

Letter to Rights Groups

To the Rights Groups

You are always talking about "rights", saying that the rights of what you call minorities are not respected. You tend to put these groups into discrete categories to the exclusion of all others - women, homosexuals, refugees and certain ethic minorities (but not all ethnic minorities). You are always trying to lecture us about equality and fairness.

If person of a "marginalised" group such as an ethic minority, woman, refugee or a homosexual commits a kills a person who is of a dominant  (redundant and outdated) group, it deserves to be treated with leniency. If a person of a dominant group even dares to think that a person of a "marginalised" group is untrustworthy, you would immediately demand that person by ostracised by society. You may say, it is not as though we demand that they be executed, but really, thinking someone is untrustworthy is not wrong in itself. You make it that only you can say that dominant groups are untrustworthy simply because you cannot accept their strength, rather than dominance.

You use the term dominance erroneously as many of those people of marginalised groups are very successful. You use it to psychologically induce people to accept your lies about victimhood.

You are not a decent bunch. You do not genuinely care about people - you are only after your own cunning self-interests to control those who you are jealous of.

The Centrists and Communalists

PS: We are the ones who you call "conservative".

Friendship: 7 Signs of a Untrustworthy "Friend" (3)

There are 7 distinct signs of an untrustworthy "friend" who pretends to be your friend, but is really your enemy.

1. They are nice to you when you appear to be vulnerable, but when you are strong, they find it something that deserves cynicism.
2. They are appear polite to people, but gossip about some people behind their backs. 
3. They do not talk to the less popular people. They only talk to their own group of elitist friends.
4. They identify themselves to be of only one group and find it unthinkable how they can be thought to be associated with less popular people.
5. They are controlling. They like to criticise and lecture you for doing little things they find an eyesore. Whenever someone else is doing something bad, they turn a blind eye.
6. They tend to only talk to people of the opposite sex to look popular. They do not enter relationships with people of the opposite sex for who they are.
7. They like to know your latest fashions, achievements, etc, not your needs. 

Friendship: The Dark Art of Being Friendly (2)

We all need to feel a sense of belonging and love. There is nothing wrong with it and it is only just too natural. The ability to making others feel loved and have a sense of belonging is a good quality trait. However, this quality trait can be exploited to manipulate others. Some people are able to hide their dark motives by showing friendship, not for the other person, but for their own gain. These people tend to be those who seem friendly, but are cliquey. They tend to be popular with their own group of friends who are also very popular and powerful. This is what you would call the 'TC' group at school.

Any group that made of mainly popular and powerful people, whether they are academic, sporty, musical or artistic is a 'TC' group. A 'TC' group is not necessarily a mean, bullying group, at least in appearance, but it is typically somewhat snobby and discriminates the "lesser", beta groups. They are empowered because they have the ability to make others feel comfortable where they are, whether this 'comfort' comes from being willing to submit to the demands of the TC group to act their way or adapt to their way, or from feeling vindicated about what one does. It is to be noted that this is not to say that are all bad.

People who appear friendly may only want to be friendly to gain your affection, and have no regard for your needs. It is important to discern whether someone being friendly to you really means it. To do so, one must look at how they treat others, especially those who are less popular or powerful.