Darwinism (5): The Ultimate Justification of Eugenics and Abortion (including Sex-Selection Abortion)

As we are all animals who have no value, according to the Darwinism theory, eugenics, the extermination of an unwanted part of the population whether it be ethnic minorities or girls, is totally legitimate. Why? Because no human deserves any respect if that is the case. Eugenics, abortion, population control and birth control come together. 

Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger who once said "We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population." Yep, that's right. The eugenicist had the intention of providing abortion to exterminate a certain race for being of that race. This is the height of racism. She and others eugenicists founded Planned Parenthood and justified abortion on the ground that it "helps" women. 

Abortion is a means of putting a woman through pain and guilt, and the killing of a baby. It allows irresponsible fathers to shift the responsibility of looking after a child to the mother. Abortion is a right? No. It is not. It is does not merely incite violence against women and children: it IS violence against women and children. Yet, the liberals who claim to be so against violence against women support it.

Abortion clinics are killing machines. It is time they shut down. It is the ultimate exploitation of women, and the killing of innocent people. 

Sources: 

The Ultimate Exploitation of Women: Abortion, by Brian E Fisher

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC97E8D2162EBAFBD - Investigation of Planned Parenthood which condones sex-selection abortion (of girls) despite claiming it seeks to "help" women.

Darwinism (4): Practical Applications of Darwinism

Darwinism has been applied by fascists and dictators to dehumanise people - literally. Hitler argued that Jews were not people by using pseudo-scientific arguments that drew from Darwinist evolution. Mao and Stalin used Darwinism to justify the mass murders of their own people.

For Counterexamples to Evolution see: http://conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Evolution

Darwinism (3): What is really is?

Darwinism is the idea that something comes from nothing and that things exist as a result of random acts, rather than acts with intelligence behind the design of the beauty of nature. To say something exists by acts of randomness is to say that a building has no builder, or a painting has not painter.

Since there is no intelligent force behind natural things, including humans, there is no moral accountability or responsibility. That is why the current generation of youth embrace Darwinism. Darwinism teaches us that we can do anything we like without accountability, responsibility or even the feeling of guilt. It teaches us that we can murder, rape, commit incest, paedophilia, fornicate and exterminate unwanted sections of the world's population.

Darwinism (2): Evidence Against Evolution

There are many testable and provable scientific theories that refute Darwinian evolution.

1. Order within living systems - Evolution (that is, Darwinian evolution) purports that living things are a result random molecules that order themselves with purpose to form living things that can function independently of external forces. Darwinism contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics which can be proved mathematically.
2. Living things do not arise from non-living things as can be observed in nature. Have you ever seen a living thing being a product of non-living things? Asexual or sexual reproduction by living things is needed to give rise to living things.
3. Darwinism purports that mutations are random. However, mutations, that is variations in a species are not random by inherited through gametes. They are caused by environmental factors such as climate, UV exposure

Darwinism (1): The Hypothesis

Many people believe that Darwinism is a legitimate theory on the grounds that it is scientific and evidence points to the evolution of species. Proponents of Darwinism show the series of the pictures depicting small horse to the large horse, the similarity of embyros between different species and claim that the number of finch species in the Galapagos has increased over time. However, simply because the embyros of different species look similar does not mean that they have a common ancestor. Simply because there are different features of horses discovered over times does not mean that they evolved in the sequence as discovered.