What is responsible for all that moral decadence?

What is responsible for all that moral decadence?  Liberalism. Since we live in a postmodern world where there are no standards of live by to hold all equality accountable, the demise of society has come.

Psychopaths are Not Merely Explosive Bombs

Modern psychology teaches us that psychopaths are merely people who have gone mad owing to one's genetics and one's dire circumstances. Thus, the modern psychologists say, mass murderers and serial rapists are the way they are because of genetics and their circumstances. Yes, genetics and circumstances may play a role, but ultimately it is the moral centre of the individual that decides whether one would do such things. There are many crazy people out there, but not all of us do such things. Why? Because we have a moral centre. To say that psychopaths killers do what they do is like saying that the mean girl or bully boy only does what she or he does because of one's inherited genes, plus a set of bad circumstances. Modern psychology is: a propaganda tool for liberalism.

Australia: The land where the victim can be in a "dominant" group

Australia is very pro-minoritarian country, in particular feminist and full of violence. Political correctness and postmodern moral relativism are the two culprits that are responsible for such evil perverted ideologies. One in three victims of domestic violence is a man. Men are silenced from speaking out about violence perpetrated against them by a close female partner or family member. Academia has turned a blind eye to this social reality in the name of advancing the ideology of liberalism - that morality is relative, and that those who are of 'dominant' groups (whatever that means) are always to blame. This idea itself is corrupt. Welcome to decadent Australia.

I strongly recommend you check out this link. http://www.unimondo.org/Notizie/Australia.-Quando-la-vittima-porta-i-pantaloni-143151. The author, Daniela Bandelli is an Italian journalist who specialises in social issues and is conducting a PhD on gender violence discourses. 

Daniela blogs at http://danielabandelli.wordpress.com.
Her LinkedIn profile can be found at : http://au.linkedin.com/pub/daniela-bandelli/7/b46/558.

Sociology: The Indoctrination Machine

The Chairman of China, Xi Jin Ping once said that, to foreigners, there is not one China, but a thousand different slices of China.  What a profound phrase! There are indeed many ways to look at society. One sees society through one's lens which has been shaped by one's values and beliefs.

Sociology is the study of society. Hence, in sociology, one of the subjects which I have studied, social theories are taught. There are many ways to look at society, and this is no cliche. Sometimes, what others interpret as a lack of something, may not be seen as an issue by another because the latter believes the lack is not a lack at all.

 For example, people in Asia do not talk about rights. Instead, these people talk about communalistic obligations. People in the West may see this a dangerous because it leads to entrenched discrimination because people are not able to fight for what they see as rights. However, people from communalistic societies could argue that  allowing people to fight for rights leads to unacceptable selfish behaviour and does not stop discrimination. Different social groups have a different framework of thinking, and hence a different social structure.

Sociology courses in Western universities are based on humanistic, rights-based framework. It is not an objective ideology that all must submit to, but a subjective one. It is a perspective. The dangerous thing about sociology courses is that lecturers are in a position to indoctrinate students with ideologies that are dangerous - ones that incite hatred against certain groups who are against the liberal regime, in the guise of tolerance. Tolerance, in which one must support certain minorities and hate those who are against them. This is the hidden agenda that infiltrates modern universities - the intolerance of tolerance.

Everything's a matter of interpretation (except when it offends me)

These days in the West, everything is a matter of interpretation. Words have no meaning, and a construct. In our modern individualist society, where the individual is paramount, words have a meaning that depends on what the individual says. It is now up to the individual to define words on one's terms. This many sound very egalitarian and communalistic by not imposing on people any code of conduct regarding the use of words. However, this has lead to the battle of opposing groups to decide what is offensive and what is not.

This era of postmodernism has lead to the cloud of repression which seeks to control the thoughts and expression of people. People can longer express their opinion about certain things because their opinion is deemed "offensive" in itself. The cloud of repression empowers the political correctness police made up of certain identifiable categories of ideologues to impose their views of others such that anything who do not conform is ostracised. Political correctness has now dominated our thinking. The PC police is getting stronger and recruiting more unsuspecting people into a trap - a freedom trap which twists the definition of freedom and liberty.

Tony Abbott has been a casualty of the PC war. He was lambasted by the media for saying a female colleague has sex appeal, but a woman would not have been lambasted if she said the same of a man. These days, a feminist woman can say anything, but her enemies (conservative women and men) can't because their views are "irrelevant" and "outdated". This is because the feminists are now deemed to be ones that can dictate who says what, among other progressive radical groups. The hypocrisy of the PC police wreaks of the most repugnant stench.

The adoption of PC starts at university where students must follow the politically correct norm with the pretext that it is the way in live in society. Students and lecturers who criticise certain groups from a "conservative" perspective are silenced because no university wants to look naive and conservative. It is in the best interests of every university to look enlightened. Progressiveness is the new Enlightenment.

Indeed, the silencing of the truth cannot be changed by a single individual, but it can change when the ignorant masses realise what type of society we live in - one that oppresses what is true and fights for all perversion.

Social Progressivism is about Only helping Minorities

It seems that helping only minorities (what is a minority in the first place?) is the only acceptable form of humanitarianism. Any suggestion that helping the dominant is not only laughable but wrong, and supportive of the redundant, archaic conservative "capitalist", "imperialist" agenda. The progressive radicals think attempt to make people feel sympathetic towards these privileged minorities and nothing but anger and hatred towards the oppressed dominant.

'Oppressed dominance' is not an oxymoron. It is the oppression of the dominant groups that they cannot complain or even speak of their ill-treatment. These is the oppression. The privilege of the minorities is that they can use their identity to cry victim. Anyone who even suggests that they are not so innocent, or not innocent at all, for that matter is ostracised the progressives.

It seems that the progressives scream blue murder as soon as people attempt to critique them. It is only ironic that they don't realise that they can be the most extremist, bigoted and hypocritical bunch of all.

The sad thing is that this idea that the minorities cannot never be privileged and that he dominant can never be oppressed is what drives university education.

University is the breeding ground for the Ghosts of Minoritarianism. These ghosts ran rampant where the university graduates go to work in - everywhere.

The Hidden Agenda of the Typical Lecturer

Most lecturers at university have a personal, moral, or worse still, a political agenda to influence students in negative ways. Many lecturers in the postmodern age  have liberal values which are based on postmodern philosophies. Postmodernism is responsible for many of the twisted and illogical  ideologies of the modern world such as feminism, liberalism, identity politics and progressivism.

The reason why so many lecturers have liberal values is that universities like to have a progressive rather than conservative image, an image associated with being educated and sophisticated, rather than naive and backwards.

This is why university students need to be able to challenge not only the views of lecturers, but be able to attack the logic of these views. Once the logic is attacked, one can get a foothold and expose their twisted ideologies.

Beware of cunning deceitful lecturers

Academia has contributed much to the philosophical pandemonium faced by our modern world, in particular, the youth of today around the world. These philosophies have been incalcated in the minds of many, influencing the way we think, act, live and ultimately, how we will lead the next generation.

What one thinks is very important. It determines one's outlook in life and how one will behave. How one behaves has a huge impact on others, and ultimately, the world. For every act you make, you are influencing others to do the same. Indeed, every individual has the potential to influence. Therefore, it is crucial that the modern youth develops a "capacity for doubt" and a "hankering for the truth".

I will explore how many seemingly academic, logical philosophies are really not as logical as they really are in the next few posts.