Why are so Many Men Scared of their Wives? Advice for marriage

Why? It is because their wives are bossy, evil, conniving hags who seek to control them using emotional techniques. These women pretend to be so sweet, but are really a bunch of serpents. Women often pander to men, but belittle their men when they don't give them what they want.

Many men in China today, a family-orientated culture, do not visit their families, all because of their wives. Their wives do not encourage them to because they don't like their family. How sad! No wonder divorces are increasing, and thus, one should not simply blame men just because they feel they can't cope with their marriages. This social phenomenon of men being scared of their wives is present universally.

Take Obama's wife for example. Her scowling, screwed face, when Obama was just taking a selfie with the English and Dannish PM was evident of her controlling aggression.

To the modern controlling conniving wife: if your husband wants to divorce you, it might be because of you. Don't just blame him because he doesn't think he can cope with you anymore. It is more likely that it is because of the way you treat him.

Advice to men: Never marry a woman who thinks you need to serve her to satisfy her by her standards. Such women are selfish, conniving hags.

The History of TV (2): Liberalism is the Golden Calf of Hollywood

Liberalism infected Hollywood during what can be termed the 'Cultural Revolution of American TV' which was exported to other countries through songs, TV, film and theatre. Hollywood thrives on liberalism. A show which portrayed the traditional family as good, and abortion, casual sex and homosexuality as evil would be condemned. This influenced the culture greatly, normalising casual sex, homosexuality and abortion. The traditional family, and in particular, the strong family man, was vilified as conservative, backwards and redundant, leading to the acceptance of the tradition family as a matter of personal choice rather than as a moral obligation.

Marriages Case Study (3)

Beth was a conservative woman who liked Bob, a liberal man. Beth put her reservations aside and married Bob, and then gave Bob the best 30 years of her life. Beth had children with Bob and raised them to college.

Then, around age 50, Bob decided he'd like to date younger women. He divorced Beth against her wishes, and now she lives alone.

Bob's actions were consistent with the Hollywood values he preferred. Beth's actions in staying with Bob and raising the children during her younger years were consistent with her conservative values. But now Bob is happy, while Beth is not.

This is a lesson why one should not marry a liberal. Liberals tend to have lower moral standards about sexual ethics. Therefore, they are more likely to view marriage as mere companionship in which one should be free to choose more sexual partners, and that the other must "respect" that - to respect another's wishes to have multiple romantic/sexual partners. Unless you are prepared to do that, don't marry a liberal.

Source: Conservapedia.com

Marriages Case Study 2

Suzy was attractive, and promiscuous. Joe, a conservative, liked Suzy and was impressed by her ability to excel at a top college and even succeed at a good graduate school. Joe decided it did not matter if Suzy did not share his conservative values, and Joe married Suzy.

For the next 25 years Joe tried with Suzy to have children, without success. What caused the infertility can never be known with certainty, but it is known that about half of promiscuous people carry sexually transmitted diseases, and that these diseases can cause infertility.

One should not marry someone simply because of their abilities, or even simply because they are not promiscuous. One should make sure one behaves morally before expecting others to behave morally. Liberals are more likely to spread sexually transmitted diseases to others than conservatives, owing to their lax attitude towards sexual relations. One should be careful before one gets married in relation to past sexual relations, among other things. Above all, one should also not judge others - being careful is not being judgmental. 

Source: Conservapedia

Marriages Case Study (1)

Ralph was a conservative who attended a graduate school having a predominantly liberal culture. There he fell in love with a woman who was quite liberal and held a very different set of values. He married her, but within six months he realized he had made a mistake, and within a year filed for divorce.

However, Ralph belonged to a church that does not accept divorce, and it took him another four grueling years to obtain an annulment.

What became the worst experience of his life could have been avoided had he realized the benefits of marrying a conservative.

As liberals typically believe in rights rather than obligations, they are more likely to get satisfaction from making their spouses feel miserable and to use violence against them. Violence by liberalists against non-liberalists, especially that by women, is more likely to be socially accepted.

Source: Conservapedia.com

The Enemy of Big Government is a Happy Stable Family

Why is it that socialistic governments support government-funded birth control? Birth control funded by the government encourages people to engage in more extramarital sex, increasing the chance of single parenthood, in particular, single motherhood.

Statistics shows that nonmarried households have a higher rate of living in poverty than married households. This can be explained by the greater stability of a family which has married parents. Poverty places a family in a position of dependency on the government, providing the government grounds to provide them welfare, further feeding dependency on the governments. Such governments encourage such dependency of families in poverty as means of maintaining their voting stock.

This dependency can be broken by increasing solidity of families which would involve parents who are married, not merely in a relationship where one can leave another. But wait, marriage is now meaningless because marriage is now a mere contract. No wonder so many people do not want to marry.

It's so Fashionable to be a Child/Youth Worker (yes, in Australia)

Many teenagers from the age of 14 to young adults of university age are employed in casual jobs. I understand that not everyone is there for the money, but I do understand that many of them, but not all, have the motive of competing with their friends in terms of their career prospects. A girl once told me that she wanted to work because you 'need to work your way up'. She is one of many who is a materialist and a hedonist. This quest for power is the same for the quest for riches as they are both material possessions. Many people think that serving the boss is something worthwhile, while helping one's family members and serving one's family is slavery. It is this disdain of helping the family that many think it is fashionable to start working early - to fight for power and money.

I am not in any way saying it is wrong to work while young. I am pointing out the attitude of many young people whose motive to work is a means of seeking power and money.

A Counter Revolution against the Norm

American cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead once said, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."

Indeed, it is. However, whether the change is good or not is another matter. In a world that is becoming increasing feminist, The Antigones has started, not a movement, but a gathering of people to counter the increasing feminisation of the Europe, and the world at large. Some have labelled it an extremist group. Some  have expressed admiration for its courage to stand up for real womanhood which has been destroyed by radical feminist groups. Some have applauded it as the leader of an antifeminist counter-revolution.

Feminism has destroyed womanhood by telling women that they need to become like men or that women do not need men. It is based on the idea that women do not need men in the family, community or social life. It has failed to recognise that men and women are inherently different and that both have different gifts. Everyone has gifts that are given to them to serve others, not harm or hurt others. Individualistic ideologies, including feminism has conditioned society to think that help others is a sign of oppression.

The Antigones embodies real womanhood and femininity. It makes it clear that real womanhood is not about disempowering men. It is about empowering men. Only when men and women help each other will there be community. One's sexuality is a unique gift, not a curse. Feminism uses the historical injustices faced by women as a pretext to disempower men, leading to the breakdown of families and hence, community.

Watch the video message from The Antigones to Femen, a radical feminist group. 

It used to be..(4)

It used to be that work was done to serve the family and community. The husband and wife would distribute out the work as to who would work at home and who would work in the community. Either way, work was done to serve others.

No longer has work become a service to the community. Work now needs to be a career, especially for women. There has been many expectations placed on women to have a career and family. Those who can have both are successful. Those who can't are unsuccessful. Work that is not capable of being a career, that is, work that is not intellectual, or involving leading others, is not valuable. Such work is regarded as non-work.

Interestingly enough, a career, as the term is understood in the postmodern world, does not have to be one that is lucrative. It can be one that has much power or fame. Many of the powerful politicians and public servants, such as commissioners, are really just after the fame and power, in the guise of wanting to help others. Many of the powerful women politicians use women's rights as a pretext for their want of fame and power. It is an easy pretext to use because half the population is female, such that they can get more votes, and that such an issue is regarded as a sensitive one.

People have become so focused on their careers at the expense of relationships. Parents have neglected the needs of their children by letting other people look after them. Young people are becoming increasingly arrogant about their prospects. Women have become extremely proud about their careers that they look down on stay-at-home mothers.

That work has become a status symbol means that helping others is choice that people make depending on what they can gain. Our humanity has gone. Welcome to the postmodern world where there are very few  who truly serve others through their work.

It used to be... (2)

It used to be that the education started at the home in the family. A family, now called the 'traditional family' consisted of a husband, wife and children. The parents would serve the family and community. The parents would teach their children values to guide and support their emotional, physical, social, mental and spiritual needs.

Now, parents fail to teach their children family and community values. Many parents of the Generation Y youth do not set examples for their children in many areas. Many parents do not have family values and do not have healthy relationships with others, especially people of the opposite sex. They had children out of wedlock, leaving the children brought up in a family that is unstable. Even if the parents do get married, the children are instilled with the idea that it is acceptable for parents to be unmarried, more importantly that it is right to engage in  sexual relationship outside of marriage.

This has produced a perverse, degenerate and morally decadent generation, a generation that has no respect for others, is selfish, and callous. People of Generation Y blame others for their own problems, except for when someone of their group (the classic example would be a young woman who is outraged about rape, but does not care if a man was harassed in a similar way).

It beggars the question as to how this generation can lead the future generations to come. How? It is a hard question given the lack of community and family values Generation Y has.

It used to be ... (1)

It used to be that a relationship was founded on love and respect. It involved friendship and honesty about the character of the other person. People used to be able to tell the other person how much their loved one would annoy them at times and how stupid they could be. Marriages were meant to last a lifetime. Marriage was generally accepted be a union between a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others. Marriage was about husband and wife cooperating with each other.

No longer are relationships founded on love and respect. Relationships now involve two people (whether of opposite sex or the same-sex) who use each other for their own personal gain whether it be pleasure, money or power. It is now not only acceptable, but normal for people to have multiple relationships at the time. We now call people in a relationship partners and even 'friends with (read: deadly) benefits'. It is now acceptable in the eyes of society for people to be sexually involved outside of marriage. Marriage has become a contract, not a relationship. The man and the woman no longer need to cooperate with each other. It has become acceptable for women to beat their husbands, while husbands are made to cower before their wives.

Yet, a majority even have the audacity to say that we are becoming more respectful towards others. This is a lie. We have become not only brutal, but callous. Double standards to relationships apply - this time to men. Women are able to get away with unfaithfulness by claiming it is the only way to be "liberated". Only men are lambasted and blamed for bad behaviour, not women. Men are blamed for bad relationships no matter what the situation. It is no wonder children are abandoned, married men become single fathers and the elderly men and women have become lonelier. Generation Y has become ever more decadent and degenerate.