We have the right to beat up anyone we want (3)

Satire of Australians continued.

We have the right to get drunk
Drunks get violent
We love getting drunk
So we should have the right to do anything we want
Including the right to beat up anyone who we hate
We beat up international students
Because they are Asian
We also beat up Aborigines who will beat us up
And Africans too
Because they are not included
As they are not Australian in our eyes
Dress up in whatever we want
On a Saturday night
But others do not have a right to do so

We have the right to get smashed, because we like it (2)

This series of posts is a satire of Australians, dedicated to Australians.

We have the right to get smashed
Because we love to get smashed
Getting to the hospital
At 2am
Liver is dead
I'm the drinking queen (or king)
Celebrate my drunkeness with my friends
Dead liver makes me a queen (or king)
Anyone who doesn't get smashed
Is just a loser, loser, loser
That's right
A loser, loser, loser
Because they are missing out!
On getting smashed
How we love to get smashed!

Putting a price on Life: Abortion

Look at this cute little munchkin.
Source: Live Action

Hollywood Exposed (5): Manipulation and Brainwashing

These Hollywood people have been subjected to many brainwashing techniques as a form of torture. They are 'programmed' to promote the immoral things they promote. However, even torture is not an excuse for promoting what they promote. There is a way out when they choose to seek a way out.

Hollywood Exposed (3): Boys gone Mad

Similarly, Hollywood is full of bad boys who glorify violence, drunkness, misogyny and aggression. They encourage boys to degrade themselves by getting smashed, taking drugs, being violent and breaking the law.

However, they have been judged more than Hollywood bad girls. Much judgment has been directed towards them by women's groups to claim to seek ending the exploitation of women and girls. Why do such activists not criticise the Hollywood women who are equally bad, and influence young women to degrade themselves? It is because they think women are 'morally superior'.

What people see on screen has a much greater effect than one knows. Until one is shocked into seeing how much one is influenced by TV, one will be influenced by it.

Hollywood Exposed (2): Girls Gone Wild (and Delusional, Stupid and Idiotic)

Many young women think that singers such as Lady Gaga, Beyonce, etc empower them by being a role model for girls. They think that these singers empower themselves by being scantily scad, manipulating men for financial and sexual purposes, and getting smashed. Empowering? Dressing up scantily scad is not empowering. Manipulating people is not empowering - you will lose and others will have grounds to do the same to you. Don't believe me? Then I ask, why does the cycle of revenge occur? Getting smashed is not empowering.

I do not in anyway buy into the idea of empowerment, but that people think such behaviour is empowering shows that moral standards are twisted. There are no longer any moral standards in society anymore. To think that sexualisation of people is wrong because it disempowers them is utterly selfish. It is not about self-empowerment - it is about respecting others by not using them as means to an ends but ends in themselves.

To think that getting smashed and scad is empowering is absolutely foolish. Don't you think? To say that "I love getting smashed" is to say "I love being vulnerable, I love being subject to abuse and manipulation".

Hollywood Exposed: The Re-Making of a Person (1)

Why do kids from Disney go from good girl gone bad? Miley Cyrus, Christina Aguilera among many others have been turned from innocent to sexualised. The young men in Hollywood have also been used to promote evil, such as violence and drug-taking. This is all deliberate.  Hollywood is controlled by people who have an agenda to bring ruin to society by attacking morality. This is why people these days do not believe in moral absolutes, other than postmodernism. They have been trained to believe that there is no morality because there is nothing that we are accountable to.

The Monstrous Regime of Hollywood

Hollywood, if nothing else is the most evil force that has lead to moral degradation. It promotes infidelity, drug us, alcoholism among other things. I will be exploring the evils of Hollywood in the next few videos.

1. Brainwashing of actors and actresses
2. Destroying girls
3. Manipulating (and eventually) destroying boys
4. Legitimising evil acts
5. The Secrets behind it

My Heart Beats. I'm Human. I'm Alive.

A foetus is human from conception. Science has proven this reality. It is not some mush, some 'uterine material, as you may be told in class, but it is a human. It is not a matter of how long a baby has been in the womb. It is human.

Where does 'Equality' Come from?

There is a great deal of debate and talk about equality, but the one question no one ever asks is: what is the origin of equality? By whose standards does equality come from? We seem to think that we can use human standards, however, humans have shown that they cannot agree on what is the meaning of equality. Thus, it appears, that equality cannot be found by using human standards. There must be something else to provide for equality, or else, equality has no meaning.

Why are so Many Men Scared of their Wives? Advice for marriage

Why? It is because their wives are bossy, evil, conniving hags who seek to control them using emotional techniques. These women pretend to be so sweet, but are really a bunch of serpents. Women often pander to men, but belittle their men when they don't give them what they want.

Many men in China today, a family-orientated culture, do not visit their families, all because of their wives. Their wives do not encourage them to because they don't like their family. How sad! No wonder divorces are increasing, and thus, one should not simply blame men just because they feel they can't cope with their marriages. This social phenomenon of men being scared of their wives is present universally.

Take Obama's wife for example. Her scowling, screwed face, when Obama was just taking a selfie with the English and Dannish PM was evident of her controlling aggression.

To the modern controlling conniving wife: if your husband wants to divorce you, it might be because of you. Don't just blame him because he doesn't think he can cope with you anymore. It is more likely that it is because of the way you treat him.

Advice to men: Never marry a woman who thinks you need to serve her to satisfy her by her standards. Such women are selfish, conniving hags.

No Moral Absolutes?

If there are no moral absolutes, there is no standard of right and wrong. Anything would then, be justifiable, including genocide and incest.

The History of TV (2): Liberalism is the Golden Calf of Hollywood

Liberalism infected Hollywood during what can be termed the 'Cultural Revolution of American TV' which was exported to other countries through songs, TV, film and theatre. Hollywood thrives on liberalism. A show which portrayed the traditional family as good, and abortion, casual sex and homosexuality as evil would be condemned. This influenced the culture greatly, normalising casual sex, homosexuality and abortion. The traditional family, and in particular, the strong family man, was vilified as conservative, backwards and redundant, leading to the acceptance of the tradition family as a matter of personal choice rather than as a moral obligation.

Marriages Case Study (6)

John attended a Conservative college, where he met Nancy, who attended a liberal college in the same city. The two dated, and developed strong feelings for one another, despite their large differences in their values. Nancy, an atheist, convinced John that she loved him, and that he loved her. Having expected it from her earlier, more liberal, boyfriends, Nancy convinced John to have pre-marital sex, despite his misgivings. They used contraception, but being imperfect, it failed, and Nancy became pregnant. John then proposed to Nancy and the two were soon married.

John finished college and got a good job, while Nancy dropped out and raised their son. Like many liberal college students,^[3] Nancy was a drug user, and had drug-dealer friends. These people had frequent access to John and Nancy's apartment. One day, while John and Nancy were on vacation, Nancy's drug-dealing "friends" let themselves in and stole nearly everything they owned. They even used their bank records to empty their accounts. When Nancy realized what happened, and who was responsible, she tried to make it look like a random break-in, rather than an inside job. She was sloppy, however, and the police were quick to realize her complicity after the fact. Nancy went to jail for several months, while John lost his job because sensitive papers he had brought home were stolen in the robbery. Completely destitute and without a job, John took his son and moved in with his parents.

John divorced Nancy while she was still incarcerated. He met a nice conservative woman who he started to date, and, with a good work ethic, slowly began to put his life back together.

Keep two eyes wide open before marriage. If he had married a non-liberal, he would not have had to keep two eyes wide open during marriage. He would be able to keep one eye half shut.

Marriages Case Study (3)

Beth was a conservative woman who liked Bob, a liberal man. Beth put her reservations aside and married Bob, and then gave Bob the best 30 years of her life. Beth had children with Bob and raised them to college.

Then, around age 50, Bob decided he'd like to date younger women. He divorced Beth against her wishes, and now she lives alone.

Bob's actions were consistent with the Hollywood values he preferred. Beth's actions in staying with Bob and raising the children during her younger years were consistent with her conservative values. But now Bob is happy, while Beth is not.

This is a lesson why one should not marry a liberal. Liberals tend to have lower moral standards about sexual ethics. Therefore, they are more likely to view marriage as mere companionship in which one should be free to choose more sexual partners, and that the other must "respect" that - to respect another's wishes to have multiple romantic/sexual partners. Unless you are prepared to do that, don't marry a liberal.

Source: Conservapedia.com

Marriages Case Study 2

Suzy was attractive, and promiscuous. Joe, a conservative, liked Suzy and was impressed by her ability to excel at a top college and even succeed at a good graduate school. Joe decided it did not matter if Suzy did not share his conservative values, and Joe married Suzy.

For the next 25 years Joe tried with Suzy to have children, without success. What caused the infertility can never be known with certainty, but it is known that about half of promiscuous people carry sexually transmitted diseases, and that these diseases can cause infertility.

One should not marry someone simply because of their abilities, or even simply because they are not promiscuous. One should make sure one behaves morally before expecting others to behave morally. Liberals are more likely to spread sexually transmitted diseases to others than conservatives, owing to their lax attitude towards sexual relations. One should be careful before one gets married in relation to past sexual relations, among other things. Above all, one should also not judge others - being careful is not being judgmental. 

Source: Conservapedia

To be Discriminated Against is the New Black

No one likes to be discriminated against. Of course, you may say, no one likes it. But why is it so fashionable to scream 'DISCRIMINATION!' in Australia, as though it was something to be proud of? Because it gets one attention from the media and makes people feel guilty about their "higher" social status (as the "victim" constructs it). It is so fashionable to be discriminated against the Australia.

People who make Legitimate Politically Incorrect Criticisms are Socially "Inappropriate"

A typical situation in high school would be when another person, usually a 'popular' girl in my experience reprimanding someone for being socially "inappropriate", whatever "inappropriate" means. These days in the postmodern era, speaking for the truth whether it involves criticism of false doctrines is met with a backlash. Only for making legitimate criticism about a doctrine by attacking their logic. Most of the people who make such reprimandings are typically people who do not understand the doctrine or beliefs being criticised, and yet think that they are right to interfere with the freedom of speech of others. These people are typically very legalistic, and believe that the as long as something is socially acceptable, it is morally right. It seems that these people are the ones who need reprimanding. They are infected by the virus of political correctness.

These people, in my experience, typically become prefects in Australian schools because they are seen as
more "responsible" for having the initiative to call someone out for merely saying something true but not accepted as true. No wonder, our society is becoming more morally deluded because schools instill legalistic hypocritical politically correct values in students. It all starts in the educational system.

The Only Truth is that...There is no truth - How contradictory

To say that there is no one truth but many truths regarding the same object or subject is to say that the truth is defined by what the individual believes is the truth. In postmodern logic, "truth" is what one believes. This leads to moral conflicts as to what is right and what is wrong. Many postmodernists believe that absolutists are crazy, extremist and psychotic for believing that truth is absolute. Well, to say that the only truth is no truth is perhaps even crazier and extreme. Above all, it is self-contradictory. And, many people apply postmodernism to their lives.

Since there is no Truth, seeking respect and "justice" is dependent on power.

Welcome to the (Weird) Postmodern World

Postmodernism is the ideology that there is no 'one truth', but many truths. Truths can exist only in the mind of an individual. That is the only truth that postmodernism purports: that there is no one truth. Thus, it follows that language cannot be used to create meaning, but that meaning is determined solely by the individual's perception. There is no real reality, but that the real existence of something exists only in one's own mind.  Everything that is said is a bias, and so therefore everyone thought of is a bias since there are no truths. Truth no longer guides us to shape our principles and values. Justice is now a matter of politics.

Welcome to the weird postmodern world.