How ‘the pill’ led to societal infantilism

How ‘the pill’ led to societal infantilism. Birth control has led to a failure to take responsibility for children, and more generally, the needs of those around us. This "liberation" has lead to an increase in single parenthood, marriage breakdown and an increased divorce rate - because sex was no longer attached to marriage.

Where does 'Equality' Come from?

There is a great deal of debate and talk about equality, but the one question no one ever asks is: what is the origin of equality? By whose standards does equality come from? We seem to think that we can use human standards, however, humans have shown that they cannot agree on what is the meaning of equality. Thus, it appears, that equality cannot be found by using human standards. There must be something else to provide for equality, or else, equality has no meaning.

Phyllis Schlafly: "Don't Get Into Relationships With Feminists"

The best advice one can give.

Why are so Many Men Scared of their Wives? Advice for marriage

Why? It is because their wives are bossy, evil, conniving hags who seek to control them using emotional techniques. These women pretend to be so sweet, but are really a bunch of serpents. Women often pander to men, but belittle their men when they don't give them what they want.

Many men in China today, a family-orientated culture, do not visit their families, all because of their wives. Their wives do not encourage them to because they don't like their family. How sad! No wonder divorces are increasing, and thus, one should not simply blame men just because they feel they can't cope with their marriages. This social phenomenon of men being scared of their wives is present universally.

Take Obama's wife for example. Her scowling, screwed face, when Obama was just taking a selfie with the English and Dannish PM was evident of her controlling aggression.

To the modern controlling conniving wife: if your husband wants to divorce you, it might be because of you. Don't just blame him because he doesn't think he can cope with you anymore. It is more likely that it is because of the way you treat him.

Advice to men: Never marry a woman who thinks you need to serve her to satisfy her by her standards. Such women are selfish, conniving hags.

"Words can't be used to create meaning", says the postmodernist

Words can't be used to create meaning, right? That is what the postmodernist would say. Saying that "words can't be used to create meaning", is not only contradictory is itself; it allows people to twist the meaning of certain terms, such as freedom and justice. The motive of making such as statement is typically to shut down what others say, and replace it with the meaning one likes, rather than what is true.

This axiom explains why people these days are so sensitive towards words in general. They interpret the meaning of the word according to how they feel or believe it should be, rather than its true or intended meaning.

No Moral Absolutes?

If there are no moral absolutes, there is no standard of right and wrong. Anything would then, be justifiable, including genocide and incest.

The racist roots of Roe v. Wade

The racist roots of Roe v. Wade. The ethics of abortion and how the abortion movement had racist motives.

Every Life Is Beautiful: Abby Johnson

Abby Johnson, a former Director of Planned Parenthood speaks of regret about the horrors of abortion.

The History of TV (2): Liberalism is the Golden Calf of Hollywood

Liberalism infected Hollywood during what can be termed the 'Cultural Revolution of American TV' which was exported to other countries through songs, TV, film and theatre. Hollywood thrives on liberalism. A show which portrayed the traditional family as good, and abortion, casual sex and homosexuality as evil would be condemned. This influenced the culture greatly, normalising casual sex, homosexuality and abortion. The traditional family, and in particular, the strong family man, was vilified as conservative, backwards and redundant, leading to the acceptance of the tradition family as a matter of personal choice rather than as a moral obligation.

Court Will Decide if Husband Can Kill His Unborn Child by Removing Mom’s Life Support

Court Will Decide if Husband Can Kill His Unborn Child by Removing Mom’s Life Support. We now use the law to resolve moral issues because we have loxt our moral centre. Welcome to age of legalism.

The History of TV (1): How the Media Got Liberal

The media has become increasingly liberal since the end of the 1950s in the US. Television became taken over by liberal-minded executives and film directors who infused their liberal politics in their work and who attempt to shut down people with alternative views. The free market argument used by those in the film and media industry to justify the liberalisation of TV, that if you don't want to watch it, don't watch it was a false one. A large proportion of viewers in the US were non-liberals and that media executives collude together to form a monopoly.

Source: Primetime Propanganda: The True Hollywood Story of How the Left Took Over Your TV by Benjamin Shapiro

A Sweet Story

A hippo was once found lost when his heard left him. An elderly tortoise decided to adopt him as his own. Everywhere the tortoise went, the hippo would follow. They would sleep in close proximity to each other. How sweet!

Marriages Case Study (6)

John attended a Conservative college, where he met Nancy, who attended a liberal college in the same city. The two dated, and developed strong feelings for one another, despite their large differences in their values. Nancy, an atheist, convinced John that she loved him, and that he loved her. Having expected it from her earlier, more liberal, boyfriends, Nancy convinced John to have pre-marital sex, despite his misgivings. They used contraception, but being imperfect, it failed, and Nancy became pregnant. John then proposed to Nancy and the two were soon married.

John finished college and got a good job, while Nancy dropped out and raised their son. Like many liberal college students,^[3] Nancy was a drug user, and had drug-dealer friends. These people had frequent access to John and Nancy's apartment. One day, while John and Nancy were on vacation, Nancy's drug-dealing "friends" let themselves in and stole nearly everything they owned. They even used their bank records to empty their accounts. When Nancy realized what happened, and who was responsible, she tried to make it look like a random break-in, rather than an inside job. She was sloppy, however, and the police were quick to realize her complicity after the fact. Nancy went to jail for several months, while John lost his job because sensitive papers he had brought home were stolen in the robbery. Completely destitute and without a job, John took his son and moved in with his parents.

John divorced Nancy while she was still incarcerated. He met a nice conservative woman who he started to date, and, with a good work ethic, slowly began to put his life back together.

Keep two eyes wide open before marriage. If he had married a non-liberal, he would not have had to keep two eyes wide open during marriage. He would be able to keep one eye half shut.

Marriages Case Study (5)

Kate was a conservative woman who fell in love with Bill, a liberal man. Bill convinced her to marry him despite her parents' strong objections. Ten years later, Kate began to suffer from strange bouts of lethargy and sickness. Several trips to the doctor were unable to find a cause, until he performed a blood test. It turned out that Kate had AIDS. She confronted Bill who admitted that he considered himself bisexual and had been involved in several homosexual affairs while married to Kate. He was tested as well, and also was HIV positive, but the disease had not progressed to AIDS. Kate divorced and is now forced to take a battery of medications to delay the inevitable.

Know thy husband/wife as to whether one has a sexually transmitted disease. 

Marriages Case Study (4)

Elizabeth was a smart liberal who knew she would be better off marrying a conservative than a liberal like herself. She found one in Stan, a conservative who was a very hard worker and who did not have the luxury of time to develop the social skills that Elizabeth had.

Stan's circle of friends and acquaintances were limited, and he thought all women were liberal. He married Elizabeth thinking that all women were liberal like her.

For the next thirty years Elizabeth censored Stan's conservative comments, interfered with his conservative activities, and caused problems for Stan at every political turn. But Stan thought all women were that way, and rarely complained.

Tragically, Elizabeth became sick and died. Stan then remarried, this time to a conservative woman whom he did not even realize existed. For the rest of his life Stan marveled at how different -- and better -- his life was.

Watch out for people who like you only because of your good values, but unaccepting and intolerant of your shortcomings. People who love you only because of your 'good' values, whatever it means of them, are people who see you as a means to use you for their own good. They will not support you during your hard times unless it is to their benefit.

Do not envy those people who appear to have a good marriage, but only remain together because of the material gain both parties receive. Beware those who are politically correct, unless you can tolerate pro-political correctness people, perhaps because you yourself support political correctness. 

For people who are not pro-political correctness, do not, for goodness sake, marry a pro-political correctness person. He (or she, for PC's sake), will restrict your freedom of thought, beliefs, expression, speech and actions merely because he believes it is "immoral" or "wrong" when they are in fact, not wrong, or even, moral. Moral absolutism is typically a foreign concept for pro-PC people, and whenever they deem some act to be wrong in the absolute sense, it is typically out of hypocrisy. 

Backlash?

Sweden, reportedly, has an oppressive radical feminist government. According to the writer of the blog, Why I Left Sweden,  despite high living standards that are the envy of the world, the culture is one that is oppressive, particularly towards men. People often think that their actions will not have consequences, but they do. A video in Sweden depicts a group of young women who not only murdered a man, but celebrated it. Videos, and the media generally indicate the culture of a country, but not always. Could this possibly explain any rise in violence against women and rape in Sweden, or any other feminist country for that matter?

Marriages Case Study (3)

Beth was a conservative woman who liked Bob, a liberal man. Beth put her reservations aside and married Bob, and then gave Bob the best 30 years of her life. Beth had children with Bob and raised them to college.

Then, around age 50, Bob decided he'd like to date younger women. He divorced Beth against her wishes, and now she lives alone.

Bob's actions were consistent with the Hollywood values he preferred. Beth's actions in staying with Bob and raising the children during her younger years were consistent with her conservative values. But now Bob is happy, while Beth is not.

This is a lesson why one should not marry a liberal. Liberals tend to have lower moral standards about sexual ethics. Therefore, they are more likely to view marriage as mere companionship in which one should be free to choose more sexual partners, and that the other must "respect" that - to respect another's wishes to have multiple romantic/sexual partners. Unless you are prepared to do that, don't marry a liberal.

Source: Conservapedia.com

Marriages Case Study 2

Suzy was attractive, and promiscuous. Joe, a conservative, liked Suzy and was impressed by her ability to excel at a top college and even succeed at a good graduate school. Joe decided it did not matter if Suzy did not share his conservative values, and Joe married Suzy.

For the next 25 years Joe tried with Suzy to have children, without success. What caused the infertility can never be known with certainty, but it is known that about half of promiscuous people carry sexually transmitted diseases, and that these diseases can cause infertility.

One should not marry someone simply because of their abilities, or even simply because they are not promiscuous. One should make sure one behaves morally before expecting others to behave morally. Liberals are more likely to spread sexually transmitted diseases to others than conservatives, owing to their lax attitude towards sexual relations. One should be careful before one gets married in relation to past sexual relations, among other things. Above all, one should also not judge others - being careful is not being judgmental. 

Source: Conservapedia

Marriages Case Study (1)

Ralph was a conservative who attended a graduate school having a predominantly liberal culture. There he fell in love with a woman who was quite liberal and held a very different set of values. He married her, but within six months he realized he had made a mistake, and within a year filed for divorce.

However, Ralph belonged to a church that does not accept divorce, and it took him another four grueling years to obtain an annulment.

What became the worst experience of his life could have been avoided had he realized the benefits of marrying a conservative.

As liberals typically believe in rights rather than obligations, they are more likely to get satisfaction from making their spouses feel miserable and to use violence against them. Violence by liberalists against non-liberalists, especially that by women, is more likely to be socially accepted.

Source: Conservapedia.com

The Enemy of Big Government is a Happy Stable Family

Why is it that socialistic governments support government-funded birth control? Birth control funded by the government encourages people to engage in more extramarital sex, increasing the chance of single parenthood, in particular, single motherhood.

Statistics shows that nonmarried households have a higher rate of living in poverty than married households. This can be explained by the greater stability of a family which has married parents. Poverty places a family in a position of dependency on the government, providing the government grounds to provide them welfare, further feeding dependency on the governments. Such governments encourage such dependency of families in poverty as means of maintaining their voting stock.

This dependency can be broken by increasing solidity of families which would involve parents who are married, not merely in a relationship where one can leave another. But wait, marriage is now meaningless because marriage is now a mere contract. No wonder so many people do not want to marry.

Political Correctness is Social Tyranny

Political correctness imposes on all individuals a set of standards which ensure that no group is offended by compelling all individuals to embrace all ideologies and beliefs. Offence is anything that is opposed to the beliefs, actions or goals of those worthy of politically correct protection: those that tolerate all other beliefs or have common beliefs with those who claim to tolerate all other beliefs.

Extract from Liberalism Spells the Demise of Morality 

To be Discriminated Against is the New Black

No one likes to be discriminated against. Of course, you may say, no one likes it. But why is it so fashionable to scream 'DISCRIMINATION!' in Australia, as though it was something to be proud of? Because it gets one attention from the media and makes people feel guilty about their "higher" social status (as the "victim" constructs it). It is so fashionable to be discriminated against the Australia.

What is responsible for all that moral decadence?

What is responsible for all that moral decadence?  Liberalism. Since we live in a postmodern world where there are no standards of live by to hold all equality accountable, the demise of society has come.

Walking Down the Street

You breath, eat and drink it everyday. You ooze it through your pores as you see the latest rap music filled with profane language. You see scantily clad images of people in advertisements. Your teacher or lecturer tells you that there are no moral absolutes. You walk past a club full of drunk people. As you drive further into the city, the number of brothels you drive past cannot be counted without slowly walking down the streets. When night closes in, you hear the screams of a woman as she is being sexually assault. You see a young man bloodied by a gang. You see an elderly man being bashed by a gang.

What do these actions have in common?

Write down what you think in the comment box below.

People who make Legitimate Politically Incorrect Criticisms are Socially "Inappropriate"

A typical situation in high school would be when another person, usually a 'popular' girl in my experience reprimanding someone for being socially "inappropriate", whatever "inappropriate" means. These days in the postmodern era, speaking for the truth whether it involves criticism of false doctrines is met with a backlash. Only for making legitimate criticism about a doctrine by attacking their logic. Most of the people who make such reprimandings are typically people who do not understand the doctrine or beliefs being criticised, and yet think that they are right to interfere with the freedom of speech of others. These people are typically very legalistic, and believe that the as long as something is socially acceptable, it is morally right. It seems that these people are the ones who need reprimanding. They are infected by the virus of political correctness.

These people, in my experience, typically become prefects in Australian schools because they are seen as
more "responsible" for having the initiative to call someone out for merely saying something true but not accepted as true. No wonder, our society is becoming more morally deluded because schools instill legalistic hypocritical politically correct values in students. It all starts in the educational system.

Singers: The Modern Day Philosophers

Singers and musicians, in particular pop musicians are the philosophers of our time. Everywhere you go, you here advice about love, life, culture and politics through songs. You listen them and take them in. Their words became part of your belief system, and eventually you act on them whether for good or evil. One should never underestimate the power of entertainment media.

Check out Primetime Propaganda for an insider's story about how liberalism has infiltrated TV.

The Only Truth is that...There is no truth - How contradictory

To say that there is no one truth but many truths regarding the same object or subject is to say that the truth is defined by what the individual believes is the truth. In postmodern logic, "truth" is what one believes. This leads to moral conflicts as to what is right and what is wrong. Many postmodernists believe that absolutists are crazy, extremist and psychotic for believing that truth is absolute. Well, to say that the only truth is no truth is perhaps even crazier and extreme. Above all, it is self-contradictory. And, many people apply postmodernism to their lives.

Since there is no Truth, seeking respect and "justice" is dependent on power.

China’s Little Flower Projects Saves Abandoned and Disabled Babies From Infanticide

China’s Little Flower Projects Saves Abandoned and Disabled Babies From Infanticide. Infanticide should be called for what it is: murder.

Funny Story! (Seriously) Must read!

There was a blackout in a house and someone said that they wanted a motor so that they would not have to put up with the lack of electrical energy. (Sounds technical, and even geeky I know) A smart engineer pointed out the statement, "I want a motor to fix the black out". Motors convert electrical energy into mechanical energy, sound energy and heat energy. That is, motors consume electrical energy, not produce electrical energy. It is generators, the general term, or more specifically dynamos that produce electrical energy. The disturbance of a magnetic field drives the production of electrical energy. This disturbance can be produced by water that in turn causes a wheel, a spinning metal loop which is driven by a petrol engine, wind turbines that spin, or a wheel that turns as a result of mechanical input eg. riding a bicycle to spin the wheel. 

This story reminded me of year 9 arts festival. For those of you who went to a  school that enjoys laughing a people from the school I am talking about, you can laugh all you want. Basically, the story involved a town being enraged about a man who wanted to use his generator because they thought it consumed electrical energy, or some form of energy, but not heat energy. Either, I do not really remember the story, or that the driving force of the generator was not made clear, but they were definitely not angry about the heat energy or sound energy. However, a generator need not be driven by using fuel. Even if it was fuel, fuel can be renewable like the ethanol from corn. Ask a chemistry department at your university or at a university. Therefore, it is more likely than not, that the people of the town got angry for no reason. 

Critique of Melinda Tankard Reist's 'We must follow France and Put an End to Exploitation'

Melinda Tankard Reist has been described as a conservative feminist, (whatever that means) who fights against abortion, pornography and violence. While these are plausible goals, one could argue that her focus is too narrow by excluding boys and men who are subject to pornography. Furthermore, it can be argued that she assumes that all women in prostitution do so involuntarily.

 In her article, We must follow France and Put an End to Exploitation, she uses the death of Tracy Connelly as a example to suggest that all prostitutes want a way out. However, there are many who do it for the easy money and pleasure in any country. She also asks why the government has not made legislated to help prostitutes on the grounds that they are exploited as though only prostitutes are the only people in the world being exploited. While it is absolutely wrong to exploit anyone at all, it is not merely governmental responsibility to stop exploitation. The community has a larger responsibility in preventing exploitation by teaching children family and community values as the government is not a body that can stop everything immoral.

The ultimate silence that Reist makes is that prostitution damages men and children, not just women. It destroys families. What destroys men destroys families, what destroys families destroys communities, what destroys communities destroys a nation. This silence is deafening and so it appears that Reist is only trying to put forward her self-righteous agenda which only focuses on a favoured section of the community, rather than the community as a whole.

Any fight against the vices of the world needs to be done out of love for all others including those who are unlovable and cruel, not out of a legalistic sense of duty or moral outrage.

Welcome to the (Weird) Postmodern World

Postmodernism is the ideology that there is no 'one truth', but many truths. Truths can exist only in the mind of an individual. That is the only truth that postmodernism purports: that there is no one truth. Thus, it follows that language cannot be used to create meaning, but that meaning is determined solely by the individual's perception. There is no real reality, but that the real existence of something exists only in one's own mind.  Everything that is said is a bias, and so therefore everyone thought of is a bias since there are no truths. Truth no longer guides us to shape our principles and values. Justice is now a matter of politics.

Welcome to the weird postmodern world.

Foreign Intervention is Stupid, Useless and Garbage! (unless it is to acquire more resources)

Some silly people think that their government needs to involve itself with military means in the internal political affairs of other countries. They think that not doing so amounts to allowing atrocities to happen. It may seem like so on the surface, but such silly naive people do not realise that military intervention (or foreign intervention) not only worsens the situation, but that war is murder. Yet these people claim that they helping to reduce murders in war. That I need to even write this goes to show how naive and politically useless some people are.

To say military intervention is a moral obligation is to say that one must report to the principal of one's own school how two people from another school are fighting, especially when that school has its own principal.

"We live and work to party"

There is no such thing as obligation. Only material possessions and power that one can enjoy exist. There is no obligation to pay debts including government debts. Anyone who is to be my life partner has to always agree with me and give me everything I want. I am entitled to force them to be of me and owned by me. I can sleep with anyone I want, financially "rape" anyone I want, and make a slave of anyone I want, dress up in anyway  want. It is my right as I say and anyone who says otherwise is just a moralistic conservative hypocrite. Immigrants and ethnic minorities are the weeds of our society who deserve nothing but extermination. That's why we support abortion and eugenics. We are all animals and so there is no such thing as objective morality for us, only morality as the most powerful individuals dictate. That's why we need to fight hard for power over all others. 

- liberalist, politically correct typical Generation Y Australian